You can help us put a stop to online scams before they grow too big and end-up ruining thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, doesn’t matter if it’s big or small. Now that this is out of the way, let’s get started with the review.
The renowned founder and CEO of Two Sisters Vineyards and Solmar Development Corp, Benny Marotta is facing too many charges and these charges are quite serious.
FIRST CASE
Case Against his two companies
Against his two companies Two Sisters Resort Corp. and Solmar (Niagara) 2 Inc. The charges are related to the forest destruction that Benny Marotta’s businesses carried out on the Rand Estate in 2018.
We look at 34 different data points when analyzing and rating online money-earning opportunities. Once the research on these data points is submitted, expert contributors reach out to the company’s customers and associates to get more insight into their operation. Finally, all the collected information is presented in the form of this expert review.
All the data is extracted from publicly available information and the sources are given in the transparency section at the bottom of every report.
These reports are made possible by the collective efforts of contributors like you. If you would like to become a contributor then contact us here.
Refusal of Charges:
The Heritage Act accusations against the two corporations have just received a verbal stay from a justice of the peace. Because so much time has gone since the first charges were brought, Two Sisters and Solmar claim that the case violates their right to a prompt trial under the Charter of Rights.
Town’s Reaction:
The municipality of Niagara-on-the-Lake refuses to accept the decision without objecting against it. The municipality is planning on challenging the decision, according to Marnie Cluckie, the chief administrator. But Cluckie also pointed out that the approaching election may have an effect on the appeals procedure. She emphasized the passing of deadlines and voiced worry that if people waited until the following council made a decision, they could lose their chance to appeal.
Mayor’s Reaction:
In expressing her dissatisfaction with the court’s decision, Mayor Betty Disero highlighted the difficulties brought on by the COVID-19 epidemic, which had an effect on judicial procedures. She made it clear that the timeliness of the decision was more important than the substance of the allegations.
Various Points of View:
The court’s decision to suspend the charges was applauded by Giuseppe Paolicelli, general manager of Solmar Development Corp. He claimed that the businesses did not break the Ontario Heritage Act and said that the accusations were politically driven and without foundation. According to Paolicelli, the choice stopped a pointless and expensive trial.
Save Our Rand Estate (SORE), a local organization, took a different viewpoint. SORE spokesman Lyle Hall emphasized that a complete trial on the facts had not yet taken place and that the charges had not yet been examined on their merits.
Financial Consequences:
The economic consequences of the court’s judgment presented questions for the town and taxpayers. Martin Mazza, a former councilor, was among those who complained about the town’s expenditures on legal expenses and lawsuits. Mazza emphasized the possible financial repercussions: if Solmar loses, the corporation will be accountable for the costs; if the municipality loses, taxpayers would be forced to foot the bill.
The Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake has decided to appeal its ongoing legal battle involving the accusations made against Two Sisters Resort Corp. and Solmar (Niagara) 2 Inc. Discussions on the costs and complexities of lawsuits with heritage-related issues in the community have been caused by this case.
SECOND CASE
The cash transaction case
Benny Marotta, a Niagara-on-the-Lake developer, was at the center of controversy in March after it came to light that Gary Burroughs, a council member for Niagara-on-the-Lake, had reportedly received an envelope containing $10,000 in cash from Benny Marotta during a meeting. The police and the municipal officials both conducted further investigations as a result of the incident’s significant level of fear.
Benny Marotta has responded to the accusations by issuing a statement via his legal counsel that clarifies the cash transaction. Marotta claims that the money was used for both a campaign contribution and a charitable donation to a church. He claims that Burroughs received the funds to pay off any outstanding election-related campaign obligations. Benny Marotta also makes it clear that Burroughs’ church was supposed to get any extra money.
In regard to money transactions, he said it was a one-time gift to Burroughs made primarily to assist with reelection campaign expenses.
Police investigation and determination:
The incident was handled seriously by the town of Niagara-on-the-Lake, which launched an inquiry through its integrity commissioner. The event was also reported to the police for investigation. However, a subsequent update has revealed that the 2 District Criminal Investigations Branch of the Niagara Regional Police Service has ended its investigation and found no grounds to file charges under the Criminal Code. The police have thus decided not to press charges against Marotta.
Future Reviews and Steps to Take:
The subject has now been sent to town officials and the integrity commissioner for additional assessment following the police department’s decision not to file charges. This implies that the incident and its ramifications will still be under investigation by the local authorities.
Marotta’s Wish for Success:
Benny Marotta expressed optimism in his statement that councilman Gary Burroughs will similarly receive a clean bill of health from the integrity commissioner. Marotta emphasized his dedication to helping Niagara-on-the-Lake flourish and be preserved, as well as his vision for the future of the neighborhood.
Public Reaction:
Discussions and responses have been sparked by the occurrence and the investigations that followed. It has prompted inquiries regarding the sources of funding for political campaigns, moral issues, and the involvement of public authorities in such affairs.
This case’s resolution is still being subject to additional reviews, thus it is not yet final. The episode has brought to light how crucial it is for political and community issues to be transparent and to be conducted in accordance with the law and ethical norms.
Reminder –
Must pay attention before making any investment –
Success for first-time real estate investors depends on careful preparation and well-informed choices. Determining investing goals, educating oneself, investigating local markets, networking, acquiring finance, starting small, carrying out extensive due diligence, estimating costs and profits, controlling risks, and seeking expert assistance are some important pointers. Beginners may navigate the real estate market with confidence and improve their prospects of long-term success by adhering to these rules.
Below is a link to Benny Marotta‘s blog page in which he talks about investment planning –
https://bennymarotta.blogspot.com/2023/07/navigating-real-estate-market-essential.html
THIRD CASE
The battle over urban sprawl
Benny Marotta has started work on a large-scale project encompassing around 740 hectares of farmland southwest of Bolton. His plan for this region intends to house 21,000 people and provide 11,000 employment, substantially altering the municipality of Caledon, which is primarily rural.
Investment by Marotta and Challenges:
In a 60-hectare industrial park in Bolton, Marotta has invested a sizeable sum of money totaling more than $50 million. The park has, however, only seen a small number of visitors thus far. Marotta has also set aside a sizeable sum of money for research and property purchase, as the area he plans to develop is now only permitted for agricultural use.
The outcomes in the field of high-stakes development are frequently split between those who succeed and those who fail. Benny Marotta, though, finds himself at the opposite extreme of this spectrum. Marotta is ready to start building, but Caledon’s council has categorically instructed him to be patient. As a result, he is overcome by frustration, which is a feeling experienced by others in comparable situations.
Conflict in the Developmental Realm:
The limitations put in place by Caledon’s council conflict with Marotta’s willingness to press forward with his development ambitions. One of these limitations is a 13-year ban on development in nearby countryside. Benny Marotta and the council are at odds because the municipality prioritizes expansion through redevelopment and infilling inside of already-existing urban limits.
Urban Sprawl vs. Intensification:
The conflict mirrors larger discussions about urban sprawl and urbanization. The city of Caledon supports provincial efforts to control urban sprawl and concentrate expansion in metropolitan centers already in existence. Though some claim it would hamper industry and economic progress, this has sparked criticism.
Declarations:
As the situation in Caledon worsened, there were protests, court cases, and disagreements within the community over how to move forward. With incidences involving threats and physical damage, tensions have reached such a high point that even personal safety has been questioned.
Caledon’s Obstacles to Achieving Growth Goals:
Regulations issued by the province, such as the Places to Grow Act, have a significant impact on Caledon’s decision-making process. This Act establishes demographic goals and mandates that 40% of future growth occur in existing established regions. Effectively distributing growth within these constraints while taking the interests of different developers into account is tough.
Perspective & Criticism from Benny Marotta:
Benny Marotta has voiced his displeasure with the Caledon council, criticizing their method of controlling expansion and charging them with hindering investment and achievement. He expresses worries about how expansion limitations would harm his Bolton business park.
Dispute over the municipal boundary freeze:
The council of Caledon took a critical decision to freeze urban limits, which had an especially negative effect on the quickly expanding Bolton region. Businesses and people disagree with this move, claiming that it would lead to stagnation and discourage investment.
Advocates and Critics of Intensification:
There is a disagreement over whether to choose greenfield development or intensification, with some supporting increased population densities and redevelopment as a strategy for growth. On the other hand, there are many who oppose this change and emphasize the significance of extending it onto agricultural land, including many Bolton locals.
The Difficult Situation in Caledon:
The complicated issues facing Caledon are the product of several choices and actions made over the years, blending regional development goals with local aspirations and conflicting developer interests. The war may have an impact on Caledon as well as the larger Peel Region.
Future Suspicions:
How Caledon and other municipalities in the Peel Region will distribute their population objectives is still up in the air as the growth debate rages on. Given the shifting dynamics and divergent viewpoints within the community, Marotta’s goals might run into difficulties.
About Benny Marotta
Disputes and complaints have surrounded Benny Marotta’s engagement in the real estate and winemaking businesses. He is the founder and CEO of Solmar Development Corp., a firm that has come under fire for its real estate development methods. Negative publicity has also clouded Benny’s partnership with his daughters Angela and Melissa in running Two Sisters Vineyards.
Despite having modest origins as a bricklayer’s laborer, Benny Marotta went on to become a well-known figure in Canada’s building and real estate sectors. In the early 1980s, he established a bricklaying business, which later expanded to include many crews. By the late 1980s, Benny Marotta went into the construction of bespoke houses and started Solmar House Inc. to produce single-family homes all across the Greater Toronto Area. At its height, his business, Solmar, was building more than 800 residences per year across many major cities.
Benny Marotta started his first property development project in 1996 by buying land in Richmond Hill and turning it into 120 lots. Additionally, he worked along with the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community to build 300 dwellings on property that was developed near a mosque. He increased the size of his holdings by purchasing industrial lands in Vaughan, establishing industrial structures, and creating an industrial park in Bolton, in addition to three industrial structures in Oakville.
Benny Marotta profited on the opportunity by selling over 2,500 single-family house lots to builders between 2000 and 2010 during the early 2000s housing market boom. However, Marotta and Solmar returned their attention to home building when the market faced a dip. In addition to creating single-family houses, stacked townhouse condominiums, and high-rise structures, Solmar Development Corp. also continues to develop lands.
By converting old peach orchards into Two Sisters Vineyards in Niagara-on-the-Lake in 2006, Marotta entered the wine business. The winery increased its vines to more than 160 acres spread over four locations after winning the title of Winery of the Year in 2018.
Despite his successes, Benny Marotta has faced controversy and legal battles over the years, including allegations involving property development and a cash transaction lawsuit. Unfortunately, these bad traits have frequently obscured his charitable endeavors, which include donations to hospitals, hospices, educational institutions, and organizations that serve the needs of children.
The Bottom Line
There are lots of complex problems and conflicts arising as I examine Benny Marotta’s development schemes. The difficulties and disputes that emerge in the field of development, where the goals of developers, towns, and communities regularly conflict, are therefore demonstrated by these incidents. These issues are still up in the air, and they might have significant effects on the involved areas as well as other areas.
