Brian Gould, a founder of TruLife Distribution, is fraudulent, and I have evidence to support this claim in the form of multiple unfavorable reviews. He and his business are being sued for alleged fraud.
The collective efforts of our contributors make such posts possible. If you can provide insight into Brian Gould Trulife or a similar company/individual, please share your information using our secured form.
You can help us stop online scams before they grow too big and ruin thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, no matter how big or small. Now that this is out of the way let’s begin the review.
Who is Brian Gould?
Brian Gould, acting CEO of Trulife Distribution, asserts that his extensive background in manufacturing and retail distribution enables him to assist international companies with importing goods, allocation, and national advertising in the United States. Gould was also a founding member of the Dietary Supplement Import Association (DSIA).
In addition to being a philanthropist who believes it is necessary to give back to the community, Brian Gould Trulife also fulfills his corporate social responsibility by participating in many charitable activities organized by nonprofit organizations and initiatives.
The Brian Gould Trulife Foundation is a nonprofit organization he founded to eradicate global poverty by helping drug users become clean and assisting the disadvantaged and poor.
We look at 34 different data points when analyzing and rating online money-earning opportunities. Once the research on these data points is submitted, expert contributors reach out to the company’s customers and associates to get more insight into their operation. Finally, all the collected information is presented in the form of this expert review.
All the data is extracted from publicly available information and the sources are given in the transparency section at the bottom of every report.
These reports are made possible by the collective efforts of contributors like you. If you would like to become a contributor then contact us here.
Brian Gould Trulife vs. NPI
Nutritional Products International (NPI), a leading global marketer of health and wellness brands, recently filed a multi-count complaint against Brian Gould Trulife and the businesses he owns on a number of grounds, including trade secret theft, conspiracy, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment.
According to the lawsuit, Brian Gould Trulife stole company files, trade secrets, equipment, and information about potential customers while NPI employed him. He then sent business to Nutra Sales International, LLC, Nutritional Sales and Consulting, Inc., Trulife Distribution, Inc., and BPG Consulting, Inc.
The complaint requests monetary damages, a temporary restraining order to prevent Brian Gould Trulife from operating businesses that compete with NPI, and other relief.
Mitch Gould, the defendant’s father, founded Plaintiff Nutritional Products International, which specializes in helping companies boost sales of their new or current goods across the United States.
For over 30 years, the company’s innovative distribution systems have helped hundreds of companies introduce and sell their products through online channels and with major retailers, including Amazon, CVS, Target, Walgreens, and Walmart.
A former NPI employee, Brian Gould Trulife, is being sued for breaching his fiduciary obligations by divulging business secrets, copying NPI’s website, setting up a competing Facebook page, and taking confidential data from a company computer.
The lawsuit claims he committed these acts while still working for NPI and paid for them with NPI monies. Situs judi slot terbaik dan terpercaya no 1 is alleged to have done this.
In an ongoing legal dispute, NPI has sued Valentina Lesan, Anatolie Lesan, and Rodica Lesan Gould, along with Brian Gould Trulife, alleging conspiracy, tortious interference, and other violations. Trying to fool foreign brands into believing he has a U.S. headquarters, warehouse, and infrastructure to distribute their product, Trulife has allegedly been doing, according to NPI’s attorney Rod Coleman.
Mitch Gould, CEO of NPI, voiced his concern about the situation and questioned whether it was a true story of deceit and greed or a bestseller. He commits to do everything he can to uphold his company’s market standing. Gould said he used tried-and-true proprietary techniques to build a profitable company over many years. The Lesans, Brian Gould Trulife, and Trulife Distribution are allegedly attempting to steal his business, and we will fight them to the greatest extent of the law.
What is the function of NPI?
NPI, a privately held business, specializes in producing and distributing nutraceuticals, dietary supplements, functional beverages, and skin-care products. NPI offers a unique and proven strategy for launching or expanding product distribution in the U.S. retail market.
Mitch Gould, the founder of NPI, is a third-generation retail distribution and manufacturing expert and a well-known authority in international marketing.
Gould has represented notable figures in the sports and entertainment industries, such as Steven Seagal, Hulk Hogan, Ronnie Coleman, Roberto Clemente Jr., Chuck Liddell, and Wayne Gretzky.
With Gould’s expertise and NPI’s innovative approach, product producers worldwide can confidently enter the U.S. retail market and achieve success.
Brian Gould Trulife Reviews: Scams Exposed by Victims & Clients
#1. “If this company calls or emails you. RUN Don’t walk away”
Here, in the remark mentioned above, It appears that the consumer is expressing irritation and discontent with a specific business and its methods.
This business appears to take advantage of clients who might not completely comprehend the US market, use aggressive strategies to quiet critical comments, and possibly manipulate internet reviews.
The client also draws attention to the fact that the business appears to be ignorant of European legislation and possibly engaging in spamming activity.
If you’ve had a bad encounter with this company, it’s reasonable that you might feel frustrated and worried. Businesses frequently receive criticism, and there are established procedures for resolving such problems. They ought to look into the situation if they have already voiced their concerns to the appropriate agencies or platforms.
WARNING to prospective clients:
It’s vital to remember that the client does not have access to current information or the authority to investigate certain incidents. If the client has proof to back up their allegations, it is better that they use the proper channels to convey information. Any immoral or potentially criminal practices may be made public through reviews, social media, and the appropriate authorities.
The individual is offering the following broad suggestions if you’re looking for guidance on how to handle these circumstances:
Keep track of everything: Record all of your conversations, exchanges, and supporting documentation. This may be useful if you need to present evidence later.
Complaint to Authorities: If you think the business’s acts are unethical or unlawful, you might want to consider notifying the appropriate consumer protection organizations or regulatory bodies. Make sure to be as specific as you can.
Share Your Experience: If you feel comfortable doing so, discussing your experiences on open review sites or on social media can help others understand your point of view. Be truthful and avoid making deceptive claims.
Seek Legal Advice: Speaking with a lawyer can be an option if you feel that the company’s activities have harmed you. They can advise you on whether or not you have a valid legal claim.
Keep Up to Date: Recognize your rights as a consumer and keep abreast of local laws and customs. This will help you make defensible decisions in the future.
#2. “Brian Gould TruLife is a Scammer.
In the statement that was just made, the reviewer mentions owning a nutraceutical company that focuses on immune boosters. He entered into a contract with TruLife Distributors and Brian Gould in 2021. Brian Gould Trulife and his con artist company made this claim to spread their fake items to major shops and chain stores.
Beau Raines invested more than $85,000 in this company using TruLife. In addition to sending out monthly press releases to market his products, TruLife informed him that they staged national product “shows” to showcase his goods to national retailers. This was all fake information.
Totally depo 25 bonus 25, this company. Brian Gould Trulife and his company should not be used as a supply source.
#3. Kim Davies addressed Beau Raines’ comment in the following way:
In 2021–2022, Kim encountered a similar circumstance. Sadly, Jimmie Carmicie, a sales manager, and Brian Gould Trulife persuaded Kim to buy. There are no real promises. Kim intends to sell Rapid-Ease, an OTC 100% organic pain relief cream that has received FDA registration, to retailers and consumers. In the New Zealand slot, Kim owns a business.
The release of Covid 19 coincided with Kim’s US debut in March 2020, preventing him from going on tour or making direct sales pitches to retailers. However, he received no reaction from them despite his interest in Brian Gould Trulife’s father’s company. A few months later, Kim received a call from a TLD salesperson and went on to have multiple online sessions with Brian Gould Trulife and his “team”.
When Brian Gould Trulife spoke, he emphasized his vast retail connection and his years of ECRM slot-free new members with retail clients who appeared to like him. Kim agreed to a contract that would last for six months, but throughout that time they got nothing but rows on a spreadsheet with cold calls to businesses.
Customers who purchased ECRM were offered to, but they got no answer. Kim agreed to extend for three months as he anticipated the ECRM results. But this time, there were no outcomes. Despite a small rise in retail sales, they spent more than NZD 100,000 on monthly fees, media, and online promotion.
Additionally, Brian Gould Trulife delayed paying them for monthly website sales for several months. In the end, Brian Gould Trulife attempted to overcharge them for the stock removal, and as a final blow, it eliminated their stock without their permission. Kim, on the other hand, could list on www.rangeme.com shortly after realizing TLD was not functioning, enabling him to pitch right away to retail buyers using Zoom.
Kim’s proposal caught the interest of the enormous CVS, which intended to give him stock and advance him to the highest levels of management. TLD, however, destroyed everything after Kim asked them to give samples to its clients to annoy them.
They consequently boasted of having the links, knowledge, and contacts to produce results while charging exorbitant fees and providing no retail sales results, according to bonus new member Kim’s experience. After Kim posted about his Google Reviews experience, they also sent a legal warning. Kim’s advice: proceed with great caution.
#4. Brian Gould Trulife Defrauds International Customers
Complete Scam Company takes advantage of false advertising, marketing, and empty promises to deceive customers worldwide. Brian Gould Trulife’s virtual office is available for hourly rental. He doesn’t have a staff; he only pretends to have one by using the names of individuals he knows. Brian Gould-related cases for TruLife can be found by searching “Cases involving Brian Gould.”
Brian Gould Trulife claims that the entire “cyber-attack” is something new, despite the fact that his business seems to have been having issues for over a year, beginning with failing to reimburse his vice president of sales and being sued by other businesses. These men are total phonies. Take a look at the ratings on Trust Pilot and Google!
Avoid doing business with him and all of his schemes.
Get Justice Suspicious
Conclusion
In conclusion, the article discusses a complicated legal dispute involving Brian Gould Trulife, CEO of Trulife Distribution and Trulife Marketing, and Nutritional Products International (NPI), a significant marketer of health and wellness brands.
NPI claims Trulife stole trade secrets, betrayed trust, and engaged in unfair competition, although Trulife assists international businesses with US market access and philanthropy.
His rival companies are subject to a court order for an injunction and damages. NPI, which Mitch Gould created, asserts that Trulife’s activities jeopardized the success of its reliance on exclusive distribution methods.
The court dispute highlights allegations of intellectual property theft, fiduciary obligation violations, and the value of ethical business practices. Despite Trulife’s successes and charitable endeavors, the legal dispute continues to command attention and highlight trust, competition, and commercial ethics issues.
The firm of Brian Gould claims to be a non-profit organization. But in reality, they are defrauding multiple customers.
Many lawsuits were filed against Trulife whose main intention is to deceive customers.
Did they help drug users and help the poor to decrease poverty in the state?
If Trulife stole the trade secret of the NPI, then strict action should be taken against them.
I agree with all the reviews mentioned in the article that they are running a fraudulent business and nothing else.
Violation of business ethics and various norms can’t be tolerated at all.
The NPI’s role in filing a lawsuit against Trulife is obvious, but the court must listen to both parties.
This business exists solely to benefit from numerous illegal actions.