David A. Kaminsky & Associates, P.C.- Is this Firm is Trustworthy? The Truth Exposed (Update 2024)
David A. Kaminsky is a crook. He has received numerous complaints for abusing his staff and defrauding his customers.
Before you consider doing business with this crooked lawyer, here’s a detailed review you must go through:
About David A. Kaminsky:
Since 1985, David A. Kaminsky, Attorney. has been working as a private attorney. Attorneys Ron Kaplan, James A. English, Thuy Q. Pham, Associate Attorney Ani Tchelidze, and Principal Attorney David A. Kaminsky make up the firm. They are also “Of Counsel” Attorneys.
An all-encompassing practice is David A. Kaminsky & Associates, P.C. His firm has a wide range of objectives, but its areas of competence are primarily focused on real estate litigation and real estate commercial matters.
How to do DAVID A. KAMINSKY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Claims to help you?
David A. Kaminsky & Associates, P.C. displays its extensive litigation experience by mentioning the following:
- Supreme Court, Civil Court, and Housing Court trial work
- litigation work
- hearings and appeals for problems involving the DHCR, HPD, ECB, Criminal Court, and Loft Board
- Supreme Court judicial reviews of administrative decisions
Criteria for evaluating David A. Kaminsky & Associates, P.C.’s reliability
We will now talk about the issues that will make David A. Kaminsky & Associates more apparent for what they are.
CHIBCHA RESTAURANT, OXES NIGHTCLUB and MIGUEL ROJAS, v. David A. Kaminsky Assoc, P.C.
What was the case summary?
Before becoming the owner and operator of the “Oxes Nightclub in Queens, New York, Miguel Rojas served as the company’s principal. In connection with multiple disagreements between Rojas and his landlord over a liquor license, public assembly permission, cabaret license, and certificate of occupancy.
Rojas retained the services of the law firm of David A. Kaminsky Associates, P.C. to defend the plaintiff. In addition to Jonathan English, Attorney., the law office is also affiliated with David A. Kaminsky, Esq. These defendants are referred to as the “Kaminsky defendants” moving forward.
Rojas bribed the Kaminsky defendants to file a lawsuit against the landlord, according to the complaint. The TRO(temporary restraining order) was issued for several reliefs, including a ban on the landlord from making any changes to the property.
Consumer fraud is typically characterized as dishonest company tactics that result in losses for consumers, whether they be monetary or otherwise. The victims are being cheated while they think they are taking part in a legitimate and lawful business transaction.
A stay on the landlord attempting to recover the nightclub’s property, a ban on the landlord disturbing or interfering with the nightclub’s equipment.
A ban on the landlord preventing the nightclub from obtaining a liquor license, and a ban on the landlord preventing the nightclub from obtaining a bond for the liquor license at the premises.
In David A. Kaminsky, P.C. v. Chibcha Restaurant, Inc. et al., Rojas claims that the defendants merely deposited the check for the motion fee in its file before having the audacity to file a lawsuit in civil court for legal fees. The case involves attorney expenses.
He alleges James A. English Attorney., was hired and retained negligently by David A. Kaminsky, Attorney., the firm’s principal. Attorney English is said to lack the knowledge and expertise necessary to effectively represent his clients, as evidenced by the landlord’s ability to secure a TRO against the nightclub despite Attorney English’s appearance in court to oppose it, according to the complaint.
Case Conclusion:
According to the directives, the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the defendants David A. Kaminsky Associates, P.C., David A. Kaminsky., and James A. English, Esq., against the plaintiffs Miguel Rojas and Chibcha Restaurant, Inc., doing business as Oxes Nightclub, and dismiss the case with costs and disbursements assessed by the Clerk of the Court against the plaintiffs.
Reviews for David A. Kaminsky & Associates, P.C
#1. The problem with the AC unit fixing
In the review above, the client describes how he dealt with the AC unit tripping out the issue. David A. Kaminsky and Associates, who had no experience with maintaining or repairing air conditioners, supplied the realtor. Additionally, he must pay a sufficient amount for it, which is inappropriate.
#2. Disappointing Service
Here, the customer dialed a phone number. He heard about his condition and informed him that he had read and learned a lot and that he knew how to help him. He also said that if he wanted to hear his counsel, he would need to pay consultation fees.
He lied to me to get the money, and after he received it, he suddenly vanished without providing any assistance. He had nothing to say after making the payment. The client made numerous calls and sent a few emails, but no one picked up the phone to speak with him.
Employees’ Feedback against David A. Kaminsky
#. Try somewhere else
As per the above review, here, it’s normal to see unprofessional behavior. Despite receiving little to no training, new workers are expected to take on workloads like veteran employees right away. If you make a mistake, be ready to receive passive-aggressive memos calling you out or to discover sticky notes stuck to your papers with the owner’s patronizing and contemptuous remarks.
#. This is a job for Masochists only.
As per the above review, no instructions on how to complete any assignments. You may be given tasks that require you to manage your property, which is unconnected to the company.
Need to constantly annoy the other employees to complete your mission.
It is challenging to locate any specific documents in case you need to look back because the files are utterly disorganized and nothing is scanned into the computer.
#. The office is unorganized and hectic
Conclusion
Therefore, after reading the entire account, it is clear that David A. Kaminsky & Associates, P.C. is unreliable, dishonest, and unfaithful about the commitments and requirements he made to make his company reputable. Additionally, based on the statements made by a worker for his company, we may conclude that he and his are not good for his employees.
