Gil Traverso: Why is He Controversial?

Gil Traverso
This is a user-generated post. Gripeo does not take responsibility for the accuracy of any statements made in this post.
Gil Traverso has faced multiple legal battles. Find out what happened in those legal battles in this detailed review on Gripeo.
Gil Traverso

Ann Berry’s Prosecution for Taking $15,000 from a Gil Traverso Academic Student Program

Gil Traverso, a Principal of Roger L. Putnam Vocational Technical Academy, and the academics’ ex-special mathematics instructor stole nearly $15,000 through student program funding, according to a state attorney general.

Deputy Solicitor General Beth Lux told Springfield District Court’s Judge, Mark D. Mason that Ann Berry placed cash earned at an academic preserve operated by the Students’ Academic Achievement Programme directly in her private separate bank accounts.

Following that, Ann Berry stated in her favor that any earnings generated by the store, which Berry ran as an advisor to the program, would be used to fund excursions and activities for program participants.

As a result, Beth Lux stated that all of the participants are extremely diligent and dedicated young people. Ann Berry, a Math Teacher at Gil Traverso’s Academy, was accused of theft exceeding $250 in an individual conspiracy and chose a jury hearing.

Defense lawyer Vincent A. Bongiorni failed to deliver an announcement at the start of the trial but he reserved the opportunity to perform it afterward.

7/12/2023 Update
As of now, Gil Traverso has not responded, nor has he apologized for his misdeeds. He has ignored our efforts to highlight the problems faced by his victims. Furthermore, he has only focused on propagating his fake PR.

However, the lawyer for Putnam Principal Gil Traverso, who additionally has concentrated on the institution’s problems with money, took the opportunity to answer questions. Gil Traverso was recruited to take the place of ex-principal Kevin McCaskill in the summer of the year 2010.

Gil Traverso demanded all of the accountants testify in front of the legislature, and the entire team engaged in the institution’s inspection commenced.

In her opening statement in the court, Beth Lux noted that the shop continued by offering nutritious foods permitted by the educational institution’s regulations, subsequently, Berry Lux noticed that sugary treats sold more effectively and started carrying them.

mVCb977VDxJk1c7UDsCvBXIaN4CO5N57FinDjjmKFs3nyInY iNAeT6IViFScBjRSXaFylmjvCivl fDl1ifmsK6bL4jISAvnyZzG5xXXwvd3QHb5f4ClkRex3 fInfYYT6mBh

Ann Berry, according to Beth Lux, failed to preserve any invoices or observe purchase protocols. She utilized her American Express & transferred the money to her private bank account, where they were mixed into her own money.

Beth Lux stated that for the initial three-year period concluding in the year 2009, whatever the shop earned and the money that was donated to the students in the program was quite comparable. 

But then, Ann began generating a lot of funds in the 2009-2010 academic year alongside utilizing the money to settle the mortgage, and other fees, including taxes on her second house.

Mr. Traverso said that several kinds of accounting and financial issues he had discovered at an academic prompted makes me bring in a town’s accountant.

Gil stated that if he discovered issues regarding the store, he referred inspectors to the issues.

Mr. Gil admitted during cross-examination by Bongiorni that Ann Berry sent him an email suggesting she would purchase the merchandise from Walmart & stock the shop with it.

Gil Traverso maintains he never told Berry to cease shopping from Walmart. He stated that he along with assessors met with educators to advise them on correct purchasing procedures, although he could not specify how this occurred.

Mr. Gil also stated that Berry went on leave for administrative reasons in December 2009 after she failed to close her private bank statement and give the information.

Berry hasn’t work for the educational system until the beginning of 2011, under the School Department.

A town investigation of prior accounting processes claimed inadequate accounting & widespread scraping amongst an assortment of staff that utilized funding for schools, pupils, & technology for private residence renovations & other companies.

The 57-page study detailed a slew of suspected schemes at the institution, according to County Accountant Mark Ianello said that it covered all ranges.

Alan J. Ingram, Superintendent of Schools, stated that four staff members had been dismissed, one received a suspension and was dismissed, and another two quit as a result of the investigation. The investigation report failed to identify any among the seven.

The years spanning between 2005 to 2010, were highlighted by fiscal excesses during McCaskill’s term.

It is an embarrassment, Ingram said to reporters, admitting that his team betrayed the institution by not having adequate safeguards set up while the purported misconduct continued for an extended period.

As reported by the lawyer general Martha M. Coakley, Sherry Suber, a previously employed clerical worker, was directed by Springfield District Court Justice, Philip Beattie to reimburse over fourteen thousand dollars that she stole from the institution over six months. 

According to police, Suber stole the funds while working as an experienced clerical typewriter at the institution she attended. Her everyday duties included collecting professional donations through Putnam department heads, however, prosecutors allege she took a portion of the earnings for personal. 

Prosecutors claim she stole her earnings every single day and subsequently covered the shortfall with cheques or cash in following payments.

Coakley stated that Suber confessed to sufficient evidence to be charged with larceny by conspiracy exceeding $250.

Beattie kept Suber’s case open for three years without a decision & directed them to repay money of $14,000. She was additionally required to repay the government for her pension payments plus to take an accounting program.

Ex-Secretary of Gil Traverso’s Academy is the First of Two People Charged with Felony School Scams

I60o3iQZ1q8mdmKGXttyuNBL4egjMBh443akCf6axvHssp3VFuD57FUZoF2pm38AfNZKi3gc Uhf 4GHlL g8 b13o6oVWYsvGHhs1F9kOwuRF6uAyKfCjtrdte76m3 zD

The initial case of two ex-employees from Gil Traverso’s Roger L. Putnam Vocational Technical School to face felony larceny charges was prosecuted for involvement with several suspected reaching scams at the institution.

If you have sensitive information or have had a personal experience with Gil Traverso but want to stay anonymous, then submit it using our secured form. You can connect with our expert contributors and help in finding the truth. We never share your information with 3rd parties.

Sherry Suber, an ex-superior administrative worker, pled innocent in Springfield District Court to claim she allegedly stole $14,000 through a school account that received income through students’ trade activities.

Suber was let go on bail & summoned back to trial. According to the accusations, Suber was in the role of gathering every day’s earnings through professional activities at the academy and stole some of these profits on numerous occasions.

Defense attorney Thomas Kokonowski stated to his customer, Well, I possess discussed containing evidence to go beyond which means that I am unable to speak on the issue. 

According to her LinkedIn page, Suber describes herself as a self-employed advertising strategist who also works for Gil Traverso’s Putnam Academy as an official entity. 

She quit in the year 2010, in addition to 7 additional staff members that had been dismissed or departed as a consequence of the findings of a comprehensive state investigation of the finances of the institution. 

EykbcHFbGKmuxFrF50hDzyATehCkcyQJAALDXiNJO6fD6Zd5agl5 ontskq2YTNDA8CeXQhtWbXUVaSzX4uFmwJitCCc9P4 5RWgTbb6mhV245yU05EJHBSPXYhViE0bvN G9ZGwYUJs61AwnavGF5o
Oxj4BFlmIA0NeRjgKabeKzH30BtklpEbNQKFnd 0iO2r8RWx2nLhEtG QcyZDNpz09yj6uj6sjhrfCljR7 HR5rINHEqqEssZSh3 3Ubk4Dwl1SPzK8SB3QcRt FGBTS4806estZg QZaf31m7jaRpQ

According to the report based on the MassLive website, it claims that the district’s prosecutor, Martha Coakley, prosecuted Ann Berry, a former math teacher, & counselor who was additionally employed at the academic shop & purportedly took $16,000 out of the school revenues.

Both Coakley’s department along with a Springfield School Administration official were unwilling to speak on the investigation.

A review, nevertheless, reveals that the allegations involving Suber & Ann Berry might not stop altogether. Following a few weeks of investigation by the City’s Office of Internal Affairs, local authorities identified numerous instances of probable fraud that Putnam Principal Gil Traverso had warned them about.

During that moment, Schools Director Alan J. Ingram described the audit results as a Shame.

According to the investigation, an unlawful Student Association account maintained $200,000 per year with little influence. Amongst additional claimed violations, the teachers collected their funds and siphoned construction supplies and amenities for themselves, as well as government-subsidized automobile parts utilized for personal maintenance.

The school’s administrators handed along the findings from the audit to Coakley’s office, which revealed that Suber & Ann Berry had been prosecuted. Azell Murphy Cavaan, a Springfield Schools Department spokeswoman, provided nothing to say on the issue at hand. 

According to a news release on the subject, an academy put in place precautions such as cashiers, a new financial supervisor, an accountant, plus computer systems to function as security guards.

Another School Scandals of Gil Traverso

kXHNZUUr2xrXOJiCnvaMsUp19bs lzIecB2yluOTK7WPi1NP2uiZeBEOJEm3PZsyHlzSFN0ku2smhNqsO7Ush8qK0EBEOwMjz1WB2gyp6DE4t5dBN 2 A7NKEsgUv TjuDYteGup9t8ImwgOfG5 6MM

Staff protest at Chicopee’s Paulo Freire Social Justice Charter School when a majority of instructors are laid off

Over fifty individuals demonstrated at Paulo Freire Social Justice Charter School, charging management with failing to pay a majority of the teachers’ agreements and returning to their jobs. 

Teachers, students, parents, former students, as well as instructors representing other schools, gathered in the courtyard of the school protest. They marched with posters reading “Unions=Social Justice” as well as “Contract Now,” while chanting, “Hey Gil Traverso, you’re not doing anything to treat your employees like you should.”

Fraud is punishable by jail time or a financial penalty. If found guilty of fraud, a defendant may be sentenced to 1 month to 3 years in jail. A prison sentence of up to 6 years may be imposed in cases of more serious fraud, such as when it is committed against a government agency.

As per the statement given by his staff, Traverso hadn’t arrived at the institution and failed to respond to a message demanding details on the instructors’ contracts that were not reactivated.

The council of directors called a last-minute meeting at the Springfield Street educational institutions, but nobody showed up. The announcement contained no details about online access, which is crucial if the conference isn’t going to be conducted. 

Handling the conflict among employees and officials was made more difficult, according to Huben, as the epidemic pushed the institution into distance education, which became an approach in which certain students learned at their homes via the Internet whereas others attended lectures.

Case Study 

Traverso v. State Dep’t of Education

Facts 

Gil Traverso, the complainant, is of Puerto Rican origin. Mr. Traverso started out working as an electrician teacher for the Ct Technical High School System, it is affiliated with the defendant’s Department, in 1991. 

Gil remained working with CTHSS, eventually rising to the rank of Assistant Principal at Bristol Technical Education Center. Gil was the lone director & most senior official posted at Bristol Technical during that point in time. 

An accusation was made by the Educational Department alleging that Gil was sexually assaulting an employee, an adviser at Bristol Technical. Gil was put on paid vacation as the Department investigated his sexual assault accusation. 

Mr. Traverso was informed in writing that his position would be placed away from work until additional notice awaiting a managerial inquiry into alleged improper professional behavior in his employment with Bristol Technical Education Institute. 

Mr. Traverso spoke with two Ministry of Justice researchers, accompanied by a labor member. Overall, the investigation team informed Gil that their investigations were reacting to an allegation about suspected sexual assault filed by Nancy Benson, a counselor for guidance at Bristol Technical. 

As the Commissioner said he will weigh the report’s conclusions & suggestions before making a judgment about Gil Traverso’s job situation.  Commissioner McQuillan convened a gathering at his place of work to tell Mr. Gil of his job determination. Mr. Gil subsequently moved as an Associate Principal to New Haven’s Eli Whitney Technical Secondary School. 

Analysis 

Standard of Reviews 

When requesting dismissal, the party requesting it bears the responsibility of demonstrating the absence of any factual dispute. The judges unanimously decided that the party who asks for a summary ruling bears the responsibility of demonstrating the lack of any actual controversy as to all important facts, that, given relevant fundamental legal rules, entitles him to a decision as an issue of law. 

Employment Discrimination Claims, in General,

Determine one of the complaints claims that the seventh section of the Civil Rights Act was violated. It specifies that a company cannot discriminate against any person in their wages, conditions, or advantages of employment due to the person’s race, color, faith, gender, and origin.

It went to federal case law analysis for direction in establishing the scope of an employer’s duty within the state’s prohibition of discrimination provisions. Gil Traverso’s allegations in the present instance depend on prejudice.

To establish an initial showing of prejudice, the worker initially demonstrates:

  • An individual is an identifiable member of a class that is protected.
  • A person who met the qualifications for the position at hand.
  • An individual was subjected to a hostile work environment.
  • The unfavorable labor decision happened under conditions that raise the possibility of bias. 
Gil Traverso belongs to an endangered group & meets the requirements for the job at issue

The complainant is a US citizen who has a Hawaiian origin. Gil, on the other hand, is of Hispanic origin, as his parents were brought up in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. 

There was no information presented to the court that raised any doubts about if the plaintiff was competent for the job of Associate Principal of a technical secondary school. In reality, the data suggests otherwise. 

As a result, the court concentrates on both the 3rd and 4th sections of the initial evidence.

Gil Traverso has been subjected to a hostile work environment

Gil alleges he had been subjected to multiple negative job behaviors, including being put on paid time off for administration and being suspended for some time without salary. The Connecticut Department of Education contends that the majority of those measures, particularly those involving lateral movement.

The reality that he has been unwilling to prove that all of the disputed hiring acts constituted substantial or unfavorable does not invalidate the reality that he has proven that only one of the hiring acts was significant and unfavorable for the reason of establishing a case on its face.

Evidence that the unfavorable job decision happened within conditions that suggest bias

The Connecticut Department of Education claims that Gil Traverso has failed to meet his responsibility of presenting proof that raises an actual question. It demonstrates that the detrimental labor act happened under conditions that raise the possibility of bias due to national origin. 

Gil cites several incidents in which he alleges he received treatment unfairly than other like-minded people who were not considered part of his designated group.

Gil claims that the way he was treated differed from that of both given to these similar-status peoples since none of the others was given all of the kinds of chastisement Gil got. 

Lastly, it is stated that informal proof indicating that the Department of Justice failed to adhere to the department’s documented protocols while carrying out Gil’s inquiry may be used to deduce prejudice. 

This result also avoids the requirement for an examination of the defense’s contentions that a preliminary sentence ought to be given in cases where the allegations are prejudicial or blocked by the belief of immunity from sovereign attack.

Conclusion 

For the explanations stated above, the judge decides that no real dispute regarding significant fact exists and therefore the Connecticut Department of Education has the right to sentence as an issue of justice. As a result, a summary verdict is given.

Gil Traverso lawsuit
Source
5g4OWt86mjuu0jxeQjWVg35k5b DEMh8EFSuJwW STL9xE0vBYLyKSrVJk
B1dQumq9Q8SdiYKcbBoPd2uKsXEZZYdYno777ozB4QCbQ5aaNq60PRCNRR vPbpdvbh4oHsEbDuCC8yuDEcvrUViayeosQCbrw91HGgJdeNiSiKhjMre6woeGhF zDigilk1OoyPeN olly0 wv50qs
f J8uSnbo0fZjkiW ZiOOWg7Y4Z9zW2M0xqso1OZBlJUIncTfL5mqtG2d3OUBhNYOJlIpyL dyQR0z3528G3SH9HJ0goO4HXDlsIwAor6SurOpV1g4v7IQs7aEJ02W
4XC Ew8NczARWYQxmdW Yael3kdC6twBnnquRw cJdTCVQ9Na2HF7FBAZI3essGYCfYdEGajAB26vwsl6 VCCahs26HjSYyIa3Fwk0NWkmcYLHhwtJt0vQWkdSt5o5K 0DTcMTQEFnC48olfaGJtRN8

Fake PR of Gil Traverso 

About Gil Traverso 

hG dbVcoIoxUZKj88PENsoD6T3saI6d5vhHinrxSzkpNA9mVbzqqSLsT5vYirhMdhtHoTiS4 heRELDXq8Hjh6w92rzXzzDwo1nowPYw1nE

Gil Traverso has spent almost thirty years in education, yet there remains a lot more he wants to do. As well as he has certificates as Vocation & High School Principal in Connecticut & Massachusetts. He is a Connecticut & Massachusetts Supervisor License holder. 

Traverso, on the other hand, was forced to assume an administrative post after witnessing how damaging inept management can be to a team & educational belonging, and since then hasn’t looked backward. He is the Principal of Roger L. Putnam Vocational Technical Academy

Traverso discusses the way he lives his truth, what characteristics make an effective leader, and the way he turned over multiple failed institutions:

Change Can Be Difficult

Traverso was named principal of Springfield, Massachusetts’ Roger L. Putnam Vocational Technical Academy. He had been selected to build up an institution with a high rate of dropouts, low scores on tests, an unsafe atmosphere, and a disorganized accounting system. 

A prospective leader must follow an effective coach to obtain a better grasp of the private sacrifices and expectations that will eventually influence an executive’s term.

Establishing a favorable atmosphere 

Gill acknowledges his employees’ triumphs & demonstrates compassion during moments of difficulty to support & elevate them. Whenever it involves encouraging pupils and he understands the need of working with both educational partners. The key to Mr. Gill’s achievement is to place children first and then structure activities and financing on which works most effectively for individuals.

Gil Traverso’s Next Steps

Traverso is proficient in the promotion. Traverso went on to Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School after fourteen years as a deputy principal at the State Department of Education-Connecticut Technological Secondary School before becoming principal at Putnam.

For collaborative management, it is necessary to form groups that promote the preparation of strategic goals. Time frames, financial position, & assistance must be accompanied by evaluation methods to assess efficacy.

Mr. Gil has worked out an imaginative and inspirational career as a staple leader in education. He has gone against stereotypes to establish himself as a person who speaks when swift, significant modification is required. And his work isn’t finished yet.

Final Thoughts 

Gil Traverso has spent several years establishing a profession in education. He is the Principal of Roger L. Putnam Vocational Technical Academy now. However, Ann Berry, his former special academic mathematics teacher, misappropriated roughly $15,000 from student program money.

It has a bad influence on both Gil’s career and the institution. So he asked the court to call all of the accountants to testify in front of the legislature, and the entire team has been inspecting as well.

Gil Traverso: Why is He Controversial?
Gil Traverso: Why is He Controversial?

4 Comments
Show all Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating Add your review
  1. How can a teacher steal money from a student program? It is absurd that these kinds of unlawful acts are carried out by teachers. The Education Board should take harsh measures against these types of people who commit such crimes.

  2. What the heck? All of these crimes were committed by a math teacher; I couldn’t believe it and couldn’t understand how he could have deceived his students as a college professor. The whole amount was $15000.

  3. In the Investigation The court investigation found that Gil had indulged in sexual assault of their employees, and harassed them, which is unexpected, How are these types of creatures unable to get the limelight and easily escape after committing the crimes, and the media is unable to capture these types news in the public.

  4. Gil Traverso is the person who is committing such, lawsuits and not now trying to escape from reality. Such lawsuits affected the career of the Gil and had a negative reputation for the institution.

Leave a reply

Gripeo
Logo
Register New Account