You can help us put a stop to online scams before they grow too big and end up ruining thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, doesn’t matter if it’s big or small. Now that this is out of the way, let’s get started with the review.
Numerous accusations against Viktor Zakharchenko and his family have led to the investigation of corruption and money laundering. As a result, I can explain the facts with a lot of arguments and supporting evidence to show you his unfair behavior.
Viktor Zakharchenko: Charges of Corruption
Viktor Zakharchenko received a four-year imprisonment term for robbing the Moscow Mortgage Agency bank of funds. In addition to this, Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko, his son and a member of the interior ministry, was charged with corruption in connection with this case. Denis Kalinin, an attorney, stated on Monday, April 29, 2019, that they appealed the court’s decision.
Viktor Zakharchenko declared, that they will unquestionably file an appeal against the judgment.
In addition, the prosecution team for former bank board chairman Vladimir Koryevkin, who was given a four-and-a-half-year prison sentence, seeks to appeal the decision. No crime was committed because Koryevkin failed to sign any paychecks, according to attorney Vyacheslav Leontyev, hence the verdict of the court will undoubtedly be appealed.
According to Leontyev, “The prosecution’s position is untenable” because they were unable to demonstrate that Viktor Zakharchenko had given Vladimir Koryevkin money. “The indictment’s description of the offense is not supported by the evidence in the case,’ the prosecutor wrote. Considering how unfair and illogical this decision is, we will challenge it, he continued.
Viktor Zakharchenko will be sentenced to one year and five months in jail since the court decided that the time the accused had spent in pre-trial custody and under confinement at home would be subtracted from their prison terms.
Investigators claim that Viktor Zakharchenko was employed by Koryevkin even though Viktor Zakharchenko lacked the necessary training or job experience. Between July 1, 2014, and April 15, 2015, a group consisting of Viktor Zakharchenko, Koryevkin, and several other unnamed people stole 1.7 million rubles ($26,300) from the bank’s funds.
The bank hired Sergei Grib to take up Koryevkin’s position when he left, and Grib continued to pay Viktor Zakharchenko for phony employment while on the job. A total of four million rubles ($61,800) have been put on Zakharchenko’s harm to the bank.
Charges of corruption are brought against Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko. During certain searches, he was found to have roughly $8 billion (or $123.7 million). Investigations into some of the allegations have been finished.
Viktor Zakharchenko: Unfavorable roles of his Family Members
Elena Zakharchenko, the former wife of Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko, the former head of the Interior Ministry, was brought in as a third party by the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow to take part in the proceedings surrounding the Prosecutor General’s Office’s upcoming case. The department requests that the security official and his family’s around 50 million ruble worth of property be converted into state funds.
The woman maintains that throughout the search, her personal belongings—3 million rubles and 100 euros—were forcibly taken from her. Suddenly they want to seize the money. In court, Dmitry Zakharchenko actively participated, pleading for the case to be dismissed or the allegations against him to be dropped.
Elena Zakharchenko, whose last name was Sevostyanenko, attended the trial in person. Property belonging to Viktor Zakharchenko and his family had already been seized again (in 2017 and 2019). She brought a packet of documents with her that she planned to use during the procedure. But before that, it was decided.
The woman herself was willing to explain the history of money. She claimed to Business FM that after relocating to Russia from Uzbekistan, she started a business for herself, buying and selling land around Rostov.
When Viktor Zakharchenko, the father of Dmitry Zakharchenko, was still alive in 2008, according to Elena Sevostyanenko, she “did not even know closely.” At that time, she started running this type of business.
“I have a lot (of plots) if you look at the excerpt in the Unified State Register of Real Estate. I’ll purchase it there before moving on to Peshkovo and Kagolnyak. She pointed to the documents and said, “You can see here where I acquired it and where I sold it.
One of the transactions proved to be extremely successful. Elena claims that she paid merely 50,000 rubles in 2011 to purchase 4.5 acres in the city of Azov together with a home and a summer cottage. Construction on the Azov-Rostov-on-Don motorway started there four years later, after which the cost increased.
As a result, the woman was able to negotiate with the builder for 6.5 million rubles despite being given substantially less money. She said that after selling it to the Ministry of Transportation, she had an independent assessment done on it. She remarked that she had struggled with it for a very long time.
She said the initial projection was set at 3.5 million rubles. Even though a road could already be seen outside the windows, she claimed to have stayed involved all the way to the end.
She stated that she had assisted with registration and saw to it that the deposit of 6.5 million rubles had been submitted. She claimed that the client had been recognized as the contractor’s representative, Alexander Gladun.
Elena made the decision to use the money to build a new home after purchasing a plot in the prestigious area of 3 acres in Bataysk in 2015.
She had already laid the foundation for the home and planned to begin construction when, according to the woman, the Investigative Committee’s employees abruptly interfered with her plans. The defendant recalled that they had been revolted by the fraud, which had occurred in broad daylight.
The petition to include Elena Zakharchenko as a third party in the litigation was approved by Judge Olga Kazakova. She was not given the opportunity to speak, however, because additional demands from the accused were taken into consideration during the hearing on February 28.
What more did they intend to seize?
There are four of them in addition to ex-colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko, the former deputy head of Department “T” of the Main Directorate for Economic Security and Anti-Corruption of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (GUEB and PC): his father Viktor Zakharchenko, his ex-official wife Yana Saratovtseva, his ex-common-law wife Marina Semynina, and her half-sister, Irina Taymurova.
The security forces discovered about 9 billion rubles in various currencies nearby in the fall of 2016 in a non-residential flat on Lomonosovsky Prospekt, which in 2017 the court converted into public revenue along with other property.
The family of the former colonel was then required by the prosecutor’s office to give up ownership of two flats (each with a size of more than 100 square meters) and a pair of parking spots located in a posh neighbourhood of the nation’s capital on Vernadsky Avenue. They were purchased at the excavation stage by their half-sister, a security guard, but the homes were never built.
Additionally, the agency requests the seizure of a pair of cufflinks, a collectible coin, as well as many pieces of jewelry, including rings, chains, earrings, pendants, bracelets, and high-end Swiss watches from Ulysse Nardin, Cvstos Challenge, and Rolex.
The prosecutor’s office claimed that the jewelry taken from the former wives of Colonel Zakharchenko the son of Viktor Zakharchenko was bought with money obtained through the security official’s corruption. He has already been sentenced to 16 years in prison and paid a penalty of 0.5 billion rubles after being found guilty of bribery twice.
The women’s attorneys maintained in the Nikulinsky court that the ex-colonel was unrelated to the acquisition of the “jewelry” According to Sergei Zvyagin, Saratovtseva’s attorney, the jewelry that was taken from his customer in March 2015 was purchased by the woman on her own money already 2.5 years after she split from Zakharchenko.
She also earned 6.2 million rubles from her new partner, Mikhail Zadorin, who discovered them at her home. The attorney proclaimed, “The Investigative Committee questioned him in 2019,” and he expected a report from the committee.
Viktor Zakharchenko: Allegations related to Jewelry & Assets
Yes, obviously the family members of Viktor Zakharchenko were part of this allegation & you may get the appropriate clues for it below. If I were to describe the court case involving accusations concerning jewelry and assets possessed by specific people. I want to be clear on the following points:
- In a second round, prosecutors are requesting that a portion of the jewelry (hereafter referred to as “jewelry”) be withdrawn. This jewelry contains items like a ring that was bought from the American company Jacob & Co.
- The cost of jewelry purchased by a colonel’s wife for $320,000 in the United States was attempted to be withheld from Zakharchenko’s ex-wife by the prosecutor’s office in 2019.
Instead of importing the jewelry into Russia, it was transported to Monaco, where the ex-wife resided. Initially, the request was turned down by the court, but in 2020, the Moscow City Court made a decision ordering the defendants to pay back the amount the jewelry would have cost in rubles.
- The prosecution’s allegations were disputed by the defense attorneys at a hearing on February 28. A Rolex watch, for instance, was discovered during a check of Marina Semynina, a trustee, one of the attorneys noted. A similar-brand product is being sought by the authorities, but the defense attorney claims it is unrelated to the watch that was confiscated.
- The defense asked the judge to order the Investigative Committee of Russia’s Main Investigation Department to provide records and proof for the Rolex watch, and the judge granted their request.
- The judge also asked the UK for papers related to Irina Taimurova’s purchase of two flats and parking spots in residences that were still under construction. It was asked to make the year of their buying more clear.
Viktor Zakharchenko: Legal dispute for the property
Colonel Zakharchenko is currently taking part in a court case remotely from a place of imprisonment pending trial. He has expressed doubt about the reality of a few flats, equating them to mythical creatures, and he has called his sister a “defrauded mortgage investor.” He notes that the office of the prosecutor did not attempt to withdraw the relevant property back in 2017 as a result of these uncertainties.
Being identified as an accuser in the lawsuit has Zakharchenko miffed, especially since this time there isn’t any potential for personal property to be taken. He requests that the court either strike his name from the list of offenders or elaborate on the circumstances surrounding his involvement.
However, after hearing the prosecutor’s arguments, the court denied Zakharchenko’s motion. Zakharchenko’s status as a significant defendant is justified by the prosecution by pointing out that he was the name on the property registration for his family members. In response, Zakharchenko notes that Semynina was never a relative of his and suggests that either Semynin or himself should be dropped from the case.
A lawyer concurs with Zakharchenko’s viewpoint, claiming that the prosecutor’s office arbitrarily increased the list of people whose property might be seized. The attorney clarifies that a civil servant’s spouse, minor children, or property can all be taken according to the law.
Zakharchenko requested that the case be dismissed since the statute of limitations, which was three years, had run out near the final moment of the meeting. He stresses that the Prosecutor General’s Office knew about his relatives’ property six years ago but did nothing about it.
The judge accepts that this issue will be decided along with the rest of the case. The procedures, however, will not take place until March 28 since information from UK demands must be obtained first.
The son of Viktor Zakharchenko was imprisoned for 13 years, but why?
Yes, it is true that Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko, the son of Viktor Zakharchenko received a 13-year sentence, and charges of bribery and corruption were to blame. Just wait, and I’ll finish telling you every aspect of the incident.
An ex-officer in charge of the Interior Ministry’s anti-corruption program was found guilty of widespread money laundering and interference with justice by a Moscow court and given a 13-year prison sentence.
The Interior Ministry’s economic security and anti-corruption office’s deputy head, Dmitry Zakharchenko, was detained in September 2016 on suspicion of bribery and misuse of authority. Dmitry is Viktor Zakharchenko’s son. 2017 saw the largest cash seizure in contemporary Russian history when authorities seized 9 billion rubles from Zakharchenko’s homes, which at the time had a value of almost $125 million.
On Monday, June 10, 2019, the state-run RIA Novosti news agency reported that the Presnensky district court additionally mandated that Zakharchenko pay fines of 117 million rubles ($1.8 million).
Zakharchenko was found accused of accepting kickbacks in the form of a coupon card from restaurant owner Mehdi Douss that allowed him to save 46,000 rubles ($3 million) at the eatery La Maree in exchange for security. He had been accused of accepting a $800,000 bribe from Douss, but RIA Novosti reported that he had been cleared of that charge as well.
According to RIA Novosti, the court also determined that Zakharchenko had engaged in behaviour “to obstruct the investigation” into the bribes.
Get Justice Suspicious
Finally, I can condense my extensive passage to help you figure out the accusations against Viktor Zakharchenko and his son, who was serving in a position of such high authority in his nation.
The father of Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko of the Interior Ministry, Viktor Zakharchenko, received a four-year prison sentence for embezzling money in a corruption case involving the Moscow Mortgage Agency bank. Denis Kalinin, who is representing his defense, intends to appeal the decision.
Investigators claim that between July 2014 and April 2015, a fraud conspiracy involving Viktor Zakharchenko, Vladimir Koryevkin, and more unnamed people occurred. From the bank, they allegedly stole $26,300 worth of 1.7 million rubles.
Koryevkin was succeeded by Sergei Grib when he quit his position, and Grib kept paying Zakharchenko for a made-up job. A total of four million rubles (about $61,800) in losses were attributed to the bank.