You can help us put a stop to online scams before they grow too big and end-up ruining thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, doesn’t matter if it’s big or small. Now that this is out of the way, let’s get started with the review.
Anilesh Ahuja was sentenced to prison & SEC investigated the scam history of him & his team. Let’s know about the case. But before that, we should know about the past & fake personality of Anilesh Ahuja.
We look at 34 different data points when analyzing and rating online money-earning opportunities. Once the research on these data points is submitted, expert contributors reach out to the company’s customers and associates to get more insight into their operation. Finally, all the collected information is presented in the form of this expert review.
All the data is extracted from publicly available information and the sources are given in the transparency section at the bottom of every report.
These reports are made possible by the collective efforts of contributors like you. If you would like to become a contributor then contact us here.
Anilesh Ahuja: A Brief Overview
Anilesh Ahuja, also known by the name of “Neil”, came from Mumbai to a tiny village in New Hampshire, USA, with his father when he was fourteen years old, and this shift marked the beginning of his transformational journey. Being a person of color in a school with a predominately white student body and adjusting to a new institution mid-year are difficult for many students.
Because of his high test scores, Anilesh also had to deal with accelerated schoolwork. Despite these obstacles, he persisted, attending school throughout the day and making up for lost education in the evenings. In the 10th grade, he even started learning foreign languages.
Anilesh Ahuja was able to graduate from the school in New Hampshire and eventually enroll in the University of Pennsylvania, where he ultimately received a Bachelor’s degree in Economics. In 1992, he got married, and the 1990s saw him flourish professionally. He also experienced personal improvement.
Anilesh’s career attained remarkable heights as he rose through the ranks to become the most junior senior vice president at a prestigious bank and later oversaw hundreds of workers as the Global Head of Mortgages at a significant investment bank.
With an asset management company that prospered despite the financial crisis, he started his own business in 2008. The business was shut down by setbacks, nevertheless. Anilesh overcame this challenge with tenacity and determination.
His beginnings in India begin these days, and as a foreign real estate investor, he aspires to perplex expectations once more. The story of Anilesh demonstrates his capacity for overcoming hurdles and his unflinching determination to accept hardships and continue on.
What do you believe, nevertheless, about every point and information that is accurate regarding Anilesh Ahuja’s life? At the same time, I can say that Anilesh Ahuja is using his fake PRs to hide his unfair actions. You may follow the mentioned links to learn more about my facts:
- https://www.crunchbase.com/person/anilesh-ahuja
- https://ideamensch.com/anilesh-ahuja/
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/anilesh-ahuja/?originalSubdomain=in
As we proceed, you might be able to understand that I believe Anilesh to be both criminal and unjustified.
There are a lot of cases against Anilesh Ahuja let’s share it to know more deeply about these cases.
Anilesh Ahuja: History of filed Lawsuit 
Anilesh Ahuja, the founder, CEO, and CIO of Premium Point Investments (PPI) has been punished with 50 months in detention. This decision was given by Audrey Strauss, Attorney for the United States, acting in agreement with the authority granted by 28 U.S.C. 515. He was found guilty in a jury trial for participating in a securities mismarking conspiracy that occurred between 2014 and 2016 was followed by this sentence.
Jeremy Shor, who was the former dealer at PPI, and Ahuja were both found guilty by the jury of crimes relating to securities fraud. Their participation in a conspiracy to overstate by more than $100 million the net asset value (NAV) that hedge funds operated by PPI were required to report to investors was the cause of these violations. Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the U.S. District Court, who ruled over the six-week jury trial, administered the sentence.
Ms. Strauss focused on the fact that Premium Point Investments’ founder, Anilesh Ahuja, had been found guilty of taking part in a scheme to misrepresent securities in her remark.
Using a false representation of the real worth of the funds controlled by Premium Point, this technique was created to fool investors. 
In order to artificially increase the market value of the possessions under their care, Ahuja, together with other individuals from his organization and dishonest brokers, engaged in deceptive behavior.
Expanding these values served two purposes: first, it allowed Premium Point to collect larger fees, and second, it prevented investors from cashing out their investments, as they could have done if they had understood the true value of their investments. Ms. Strauss emphasized that Ahuja’s lengthy jail sentence was issued as a fitting punishment for his criminal activities and to make sure he is held accountable for his part in the conspiracy.
The Indictment, the testimony given at trial, and court documents all state the following:
Premium Point Investments
Anilesh Ahuja was a co-founder of PPI, which was established sometime in or around 2008. Anilesh served as both the CEO and the Chief Investment Officer (CIO) of this company. PPI mainly focuses on maintaining hedge funds, a type of financial entity that aggregates money from different investors and seeks to produce profits by investing in a variety of financial assets.
Structured credit products, particularly residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), were one of PPI’s key areas of interest within the hedge fund industry. Residential mortgage loan pools serve as the foundation for RMBS, which are financial products. These securities are frequently broken into a number of distinct tranches, each having a different amount of risk and profit potential.
Around October 2009, PPI introduced the “Hedge Fund,” its flagship mortgage credit vehicle. With the intention of generating profits for its owners, this fund undoubtedly participated in RMBS and similar assets.
In addition, PPI oversaw a segregated ERISA fund with holdings comparable to those of the Mortgage Credit Fund. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act, also known as ERISA, is a federal legislation in the United States that regulates worker benefit schemes, including retirement plans like 401(k)s. The management of such a fund suggests that PPI was given the responsibility of managing retirement funds on behalf of specific investors.
PPI increased its product selection in 2013 by introducing the “New Issue Fund,” a brand-new fund. Comparing this fund to the Mortgage Credit Fund, it had a distinct investment approach.
The New Issue Fund concentrated on acquiring and protecting pools of mortgages that hadn’t been issued or insured by a government agency rather than primarily investing in already-existing RMBS. The New Issue Fund may have transacted in non-government-backed mortgage securities, according to this.
PPI was in charge of monitoring an extensive reservoir of capital for investment between 2008 and 2016, as seen by the size of the assets it handled during that time. Anilesh Ahujha led the business at this time as both CEO and CIO.
Shor worked as a trader for PPI. Shor specializes in non-agency RMBS or RMBS securities issued by non-governmental entities. Shor was in the position of trading and managing various subcategories of mortgage-backed securities as part of PPI’s investing activities, so to speak.
Mismarking Securities Scheme
As we discussed the scam of Anilesh & his participant Shor, took place at PPI between 2014 and 2016. They intended to mislead customers in PPI’s hedge fund, ERISA fund, and new issue fund. By falsely raising the Net Asset Value (NAV) of these funds as declared to clients each month by changing the stated value of certain securities in these funds, they achieved their goal.
PPI employed numerous dishonest tactics in carrying out this plan. With the help of dishonest brokers, they occasionally received exaggerated bids for these securities. To appear as though the investments were valued higher than they actually were, they also falsified their valuation procedure.
The stated NAV of the funds was repeatedly inflated as a result of these measures, sometimes by more than $100 million in total over all of PPI’s funds that were managed. For PPI, this was advantageous in two ways:
Based on the artificially inflated NAV, PPI was able to charge investors greater management and performance fees. Because investors thought the funds were functioning very well, they were prepared to pay more. You may consider it as a higher fee.
PPI deterred investors from selling their investments by inflating the NAV. Investors generally withdraw their money from a fund when they think it is performing poorly or is having financial difficulties. Investors were unable to withdraw their money because the inflated NAV created a false sense of success and stability.
In spite of actual market circumstances or the true success of PPI’s funds, Anilesh Ahuja insisted that PPI maintain an exceptional record and match the success of competitor funds, which served as the impetus for this fraudulent scam.
At the conclusion of each month, Anilesh Ahuja and another partner would establish irrationally elevated “target” profits for the Hedge Fund, ERISA Fund, and New Issue Fund in order to achieve this goal. These goals were occasionally determined by the success of funds in the same sector that were similar to them.
The Consequences of the Case
Judge Failla sentenced Anilesh Ahuja, of New York, New York, and Miami, Florida, to three years of supervised release in addition to the prison term.
Shor was given a sentence of 40 months in jail and three years of supervised release by Judge Failla on November 18, 2019.
She appreciated the efforts of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and acknowledged the Securities and Exchange Commission’s support. The Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force is handling this case. Max Nicholas, Andrea M. Griswold, and Joshua A. Naftalis are the prosecution’s lead attorneys.
SEC Allegations against Anilesh Ahuja
As a judge, I now hear that the SEC’s efforts are appreciated and thanked. What did these initiatives seek further details about Anilesh Ahuja consist of? Come let’s discuss it further.
A final judgment was delivered against Premium Point Investments LP, a New York-based investment adviser, and its CEO and chief investment officer, Anilesh Ahuja, on September 20, 2022, by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Their role in inflating the value of the private money they supervised by hundreds of millions of dollars was the basis for this decision.
The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) complaint claimed that the fraudulent valuation scheme took place from at least September 2015 to March 2016. In exchange for obtaining inflated broker quotes for mortgage-backed securities, Premium Point routed trades to a broker-dealer in a covert agreement. 
Furthermore, the defendants further inflated the value of shares by using “imputed” mid-point valuations. This method was used to inflate the market value of Premium Point’s holdings and give the impression that their fund performance was greater than it actually was.
The objective was to conceal poor fund performance in order to draw in and keep investors.
With their permission, Premium Point Investment and Ahuja permitted the U.S. District Court to enter the final decision against them.
They were also permanently barred from breaking the anti-fraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and related rules, Sections 17(a)(1) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Sections 206(1), (2), and (4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as well as Rule 206(4)-8(a)(2) under the Investment Advisers Act, as part of this judgment. The Advisers Act Section 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-2 were also permanently prohibited from being broken by Premium Point Investment.
What were the charges imposed by the SEC on Anilesh Ahuja?
A $450,000 civil fine was also imposed on Anilesh Ahuja, and starting on September 28, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission prohibited him from working for any investment advisers, brokers, dealers, municipal securities dealers, municipal advisors, transfer agents, or nationally renowned statistical rating organizations.
Senior Trial Counsel Lee A. Greenwood of the New York Regional Office and Co-Regional Trial Counsel Preethi Krishnamurthy were in charge of the SEC’s litigation in this case. Osman Nawaz, Chief of the Complex Financial Instruments Unit, oversaw the investigation, which was carried out by the Division of Enforcement’s Asset Management and Complex Financial Instruments Units.
Currently, where is Anilesh Ahuja?
Currently, Anilesh Ahuja is serving as a Promoter and member of the Board of Directors at Solitaire Valley, which is located in Uttar Pradesh, India. It is a Real Estate Group that is building a township project.
Conclusion
In summary, the judge’s choice to overturn the initial conviction in the case of Jeremy Shor and Anilesh Ahuja was a major loss for the federal prosecution in Manhattan. This setback was a symptom of a persistent problem with how the prosecution handled cases; in the past, inadequate evidence sharing had caused other cases to fall apart.
The judge’s decision not only prevented Anilesh Ahuja and Shor from wasting time in prison but also called into question the validity of the prosecution’s strategy and the veracity of the witness testimony. In the end, it made clear how crucial it is for the judicial system to administer justice fairly and with transparency.
You may follow the links mentioned below to learn more about the case of Anilesh Ahuja:
- https://www.housingwire.com/articles/premium-point-investments-ceo-anilesh-ahuja-gets-50-months-in-prison-for-rmbs-securities-fraud/
- https://www.ndtv.com/indians-abroad/indian-origin-ceo-anilesh-ahuja-of-us-based-hedge-fund-firm-charged-for-securities-fraud-2068768
