A mother files a lawsuit against his son, for the embezzlement of $420000 in her husband’s firm. The case is striking and what makes it the talk of the town, is the involvement of Pamela Keris-Rubinson, Evan Rubinson, Elliot Rubinson, Armadillo Enterprise and the Thoroughbred Music Inc. Let’s have a quick rundown of the controversial lawsuit.
Evan Rubinson Case: A Family Affair or War Between Two Contenders
The current Armadillo CEO, Pamela Keris-Rubinson ((6) Pamela Keris-Rubinson | LinkedIn) lays down some serious allegations on the former Armadillo CEO, Evan Rubinson. Both the power-seekers have their opinions and aspects, the author gives the ball in your court. You make a decision based on your understanding, till a legal, official verdict is awaited.
The Lawsuit: Evan Rubinson Faces Severe Allegations
According to the lawsuit, Pamela Keris Rubinson accuses her son Evan of “mismanaging Thoroughbred to the detriment of the Elliot Trust,”. Pamela claims that the former CEO, Evan Rubinson misused his designation and made certain unauthorized payments to himself. The lawsuit also finds Evan Rubinson guilty of expending $420000, under the table.
The plaintiff accuses the defendant of making disbursements by the firm’s account for false ‘landscaping’. The accusers claim that the company never made any expenses in the arena of ‘landscaping’, as the Thoroughbred’s property has no lawn, trees or shrubbery. This made the payments dubious for the board and the authorities tried scanning the financial expenses made by Evan Rubinson.
On scanned view, it was found that ‘landscaping’ took place but in the private property of the former CEO, Evan Rubinson. Allegedly, not merely false landscaping, but Evan also made several wasteful expenses, without any supporting document, listed as “wedding gifts”, “Christmas gifts” & “reimbursement to self”.
As stated, Pamela Keris tried ceasing the actions of her son, but everything went in vain. Eventually, the unauthorized payments made Pamela furious, and she had to make certain legal considerations. However, this side of the coin displays the aspect of Pamela, but it would be unjust to not turn the coin.
The Six Counts of Judgement for Evan Rubinson
The Lawsuit filed by Pamela deals with six counts. These six counts are seeking judgments in six different directions for Evan Rubinson, Pamela Keris Rubinson and Thoroughbred Music Inc. Out of the six counts, one of the most controversial is a declaratory judgment that asks the court to acknowledge Pamela Keris-Rubinson as the sole owner of Thoroughbred. Whereas, the other 5 counts for Thoroughberg’s injunctive relief, shielding of firm’s equity & assets, and protection against the damages made by Evan Rubinson through mismanagement and unauthorized expenditure.
The Reverse Tails: Evan Rubinson Refuted The Allegations
Pamela Keris made several allegations regarding the unauthorized payments and expenditures, but Evan Rubinson has his own side to explain. Evan Rubinson calls the actions of Pamela as an act of pride, that does not allow the lady to confess her mistakes.
Evan Rubinson asserts that he vehemently and wholeheartedly refutes every section of the law suit. According to the claims made by Evan Rubinson, Pamela Keris, in her head assumed that she is the sole commander over the business, and ran the business accordingly, starting in 2020.
Later, after 2 and a half years, when things went out of control, she needed an effigy to vent anger. Evan Rubinson believes that Pamela pulled him in place of the effigy as he was in her hit-list after interrogating her actions that lead to financial loss and mismanagement in the firm. Evan Rubinson claims that he ran the Thoroughbred with most sincerity in no means Pamela has the right to doubt his intentions.
Evan Rubinson Claims: Pamela is devoid of all legal rights to question the rights of the former CEO
In an attempt to dismiss the lawsuit, Evan Rubinson makes several other claims. These claims not only prove his innocence but also make Pamela legally erroneous. Anyways, legitimacy of the claims is yet to be decided, but the claims are striking enough to be mentioned.
Evan Rubinson disowns the position of Pamela Keris as the trustee of the Elliott trust. Evan claims that Pamela has indulged herself in several dubious actions that have led to a warrant risking her position in the Elliott Trust as the trustee. Now, that makes Pamela Keris legally void of filing any lawsuits against the then CEO, Evan Rubinson. According to Evan’s claims, Pamela is not the rightful trustee and by making it a court-affair, she has misused the court process.
The Counterclaims of Evan Rubinson
Evan Rubinson counters to the claims of Pamela by asserting that the plaintiff has been misusing the court’s process by filing meritorious lawsuits. In the words of Evan, “Pamela has made an illegal, improper or perverted use of this Court’s process after it was issued by using her defamation in the process to leverage Evan to dismiss two other, meritorious lawsuits…”, the defender believes that Pamela has filed the lawsuits with dubious intents and the sole reason of the roar is Pamela’s will to replace Evan Rubinson, which will lead to complete authority for Pamela.
The defender claims that the lawsuits have made him suffer monetary loss and disgrace. Evan Rubinson claims that he had to face a reputation crisis, credit loss and business harm, hence he demanded an answer from the plaintiff, along with the attorney’s fees.
Evan Rubinson Dismissal: After Effects Of The Heated Controversy
It was the time when the media was busy capturing Evan’s side of story, when another thunder bursted. Just after the counterclaims of Evan Rubinson, his dismissal news sprouted all over the internet like mushrooms. Netizens claim that Pamela was the main reason behind the removal of Evan Rubinson. A few days after the legal actions of Evan, Pamela released a notice as the sole owner of Armadillo, notifying Evan’s egress.
On the other hand, Evan Rubinson ignores the threat and addresses the egress as his willful decision. Evan Rubinson claims that his departure was not a part of laying off but his willing resignation.
Anyways, none of us know the exact reason behind the departure but the timings of the decision point the fingers towards the current board of the firm. Where, the current board of the firm definitely includes Pamela, the sole shareholder. However, while pondering about the aftereffects of the case we must not forget that there has been a loss, a loss that is immense, a loss that costs $420000 and someone is to be blamed for the same.
Evan Rubinson and the Armadillo – What’s the buzz about?
The case of Evan Rubinson and Pamela Keris is a fight for authority, for power and possession. However, as the controversy includes blood relations and embezzlement of $420000, the case becomes one of the most talked about cases of the present times. However, in order to understand the whole buzz, we must have a clear picture of the historical facts of the firm and its owner. In the next few lines the same is explained with the best possible knowledge. Lets take out a few minutes to factually describe the case.
Thoroughbred Music Inc. was established by Elliot Rubinson in 1978, three years after founding the retail chain of the musical instrument, named Thoroughbred. He ran the business with all zeal and motivation, which led him to the establishment of Armadillo Enterprises in 1994. It was 1997 when Armadillo was glittered with the extension named Dean Guitars (Dean Guitars). After, few successful years in the industry Elliot took the decision to sell the retail chain, but the firm for family business.
The year 2016 witnessed the new generation as the holders of the authority and when Evan Rubinson was appointed as the CEO of Dean Guitars by Elliot. Sadly, after that things deviated from their path and the business family had to deal with a striking thunder in the year 2017. Elliot Rubinson left the world in the year 2017, after which his wife Pamela took over the firm.
After the sorrowful death, Pamela was appointed as the trustee of the Elliot Trust and she became the sole share-holder of the Thoroughbred Music Inc. However, in order to establish the son as a successful entrepreneur Elliot wished Evan Rubinson to learn all the business skills from his parent firm. Hence, after the appointment of Pamela Keris she appointed Evan Rubinson as the officer of Thoroughbred Music Inc.
But with passing time, the firm witnessed discorded Rubinson’s family. This discord eventually led to severe legal consequences and removal of Evan from the firm.
All About Evan Rubinson
Evan Rubinson (EVAN RUBINSON) is former CEO & president of ‘Dean Guitars’ and ‘Armadillo’. Evan is one of the well known names in the music industry, few of his main achievements count the firms ERA Music Brands and Hedge funds. In his life of 30 years Evan Rubinson has founded both the firms (ERA Music Brands & Hedge funds) and became a proud entrepreneur.
Hedge funds make investments in the health care and biotechnical fields and ERA Music Brands is the musical instrument and musical accessories conglomerate that was established by Evan to aid the young musicians.
Professionally, after completing BA in Economics & Public policy from the Duke University, Evan fetched investment related internships from the Wall Street firms. Soon, after that Evan Rubinson got indulged in various segments of music and business. The career of Evan has a lot of ups and downs, like any roller-coaster he has faced immense variations, these variations have been both good and bad for Evan and his associates. However, the controversial contest of authority between the son and mother has gained enough limelight for the entrepreneur.
Now, it’s up to the music-lover, former CEO of Armadillo, whether he is able to change the direction of wind and convert the unfavorable aspects in his favor. Taking the present, it needs to be noted that for now Evan Rubinson is serving as a proud alumni donor and an interviewer for the applicants of Duke University.
Conclusion
Evan Rubinson and the current CEO of Thoroughbred Music Inc, Pamela Keris have been dealing with the legal consequences of their negligence. This negligence has caused them their reputation, business, credits and mental peace. Both the contenders have been fighting the case and trying to prove the other one guilty. However, both of the parties must acknowledge that loss has been made and it shall be recovered soon.
Pamela believes that Evan Rubinson has been looting the money from his parent organization and has been the cause of a huge loss, costing $420000. On the contrary, Evan Rubinson claims his mother to be at fault.
Although both of the contenders are firm on their grounds, removal of Evan speaks louder than the words. Anyways, whatever is the reason behind the loss, all the law-abiding netizens would definitely love to receive a formal conclusion via official and legal verdict.
Till then, the author leaves the readers with a quote of Zig Ziglar, that says that “You don’t build a business, you build people, then people build the business.”
A mother get against a son for his husband. Is it a movie?????
It’s all about money, people are against each-other, family or not. Money is the most important entity.
Embezzlement of $420000! I really want to know how much tax these two, mother and son pay.
Who cares what the rich are doing. It’s difficult for me to gather my college fee, even.
Everyone needs the crown, the throne.
Even if he took money, it was his father’s firm. Why this lady is after her son?
People are looting countries, what’s the big deal, if Evan took money from his fathers firm?
Firms should be watchful, before assigning designations. You can not question the designated person after that.
Is Pamela his real-mother?
I’m a lawyer, and want to mention that each year Federal court deals with numerous family disputes. This needs to stop.
I lost 10k in a fraud MLM firm, & here he is, with silver spoon. Wasting the father’s business.
ERA Music is so good. I am a huge fan and hence, wants the dispute to settle down
If Pamela is devoid of all legal rights, why is it even a buzz??
What the heck!!! Its weird to see people going against Evan. He is very talented and knows what to do.
I wonder how cool it is to be rich. You can make rash decisions, impulsive purchase and risky financial deals. If I have to invest money in Mutual Funds, I need to think 10 times.
I wonder what the father would be thinking in heaven….
Being rich is the biggest fault in today’s world. Let them live.
It seems as family affair, but it is actually the clashes of enterprises, Armadillo Enterprise and the Thoroughbred Music Inc.
What’s wrong with this woman! Who sues her son, for purchasing un-needed wedding gifts?
The logo of the firm looks cool.
Everybody knows Evan is at fault but people represent him as a poor fellow. Although, we know he has all kinds of toxic attitudes and is a complete waste.
Its not the first time, these two are against each-other, the mother-son duo have a love-hate relationship. I have read about them.
I want to be as cool as the goggles wearing armadillo…????
If I was Evan I would have sued Pamela.
He is merely 30 and immensely rich. What can you expect from a man who got everything without any effort?
Entrepreneurs don’t need skills, they need bank-balance and family assets..????
Being a mother, I can say that it hurts when your 25+ son is irresponsible.
My mother is also against me, its just that we have dispute over $20.????
Evan cannot just waste money. He needs to get a lesson.
It is better to concentrate in recovering money, instead of blaming each other. Pamela and Evan must work together, and shall not remain against one-another.