- Nick Millican sexually harasses and discriminates against his employees?
- Did Anna Prior use her personal secretary to remain in the close-knit group of the boss?
- Being in a relationship with CH after being married, was it not a fault of Millican?
- Is Anne Prior alone responsible for the family disputes of boss Nick Millican?
- Who is responsible for the grief of Nick’s wife, Nick, Anna Prior or CH?
You can help us put a stop to online scams before they grow too big and end-up ruining thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, doesn’t matter if it’s big or small. Now that this is out of the way, let’s get started with the review.
Several such questions aired when Anna Prior, the first female partner of the property developer, Nick Millican, accused him of sexual discrimination and harassment after the company refused her maternity leave. However, the answers to all such postulations require a rigorous review of the incidents. The article briefs downright possible information about the case.
The Case: Nick Millican Asks For Malicious Favors To Veil His Extra-Marital Affair?
After being denied maternity leave, Anna Prior sues her boss Nick Millican for sex discrimination. Reportedly, the issue arrived for the designation Anna was offered after the maternity leave. She claims that Nick Millican treats his employees differently, and to prove her point Anna also unveiled her active involvement in Nick’s adulterous affair with her personal assistant.
However, least she knew that her statements would be self-defeating. After the explicit affirmation, the tribunal took the decision in favor of Nick Millican. The commencement proved the willing encouragement of Nick’s extramarital affair by the employee, Ms Prior.
The Tribunal dismissed the case by asserting that the incident was not brought in court within the time limit of legal actions and the plaintiff was an encouraging advisor of the misleading relation. Although the author applauds the decision made by the court, Nick Millican is still answerable for his deeds. A married man with kids must not behave similarly to a teenager.
Nick Millican V/S Ms Prior: A Tale Of Power Possession & Adultery
An alumnus of Oxford University, Nick Millican was happily married when (a graduate from Cambridge University) Mrs Anne Prior recruited a secretary, referred to as CH for her professional help in August 2018.
Soon after the arrival of CH the workplace filled with the grapevines of Nick Millican and his assistant’s fling. It also must be noted that prior to recruitment, Anna was promoted to the position of the first female partner at Greycoat Real Estate (https://www.greycoat.com/who-we-are/).
Her perks were enhanced in April 2018, subsuming monthly payments of £125,00 and profit shares of £150,000 a year. According to the Tribunal hearings, Anna was well aware of the enhancing intimacy between the two, but she encouraged the relationship in order to get endless power in the firm.
However, like every other infidelity, this one too resulted in a broken married life for Nick. Hence, the boss started feeling caged in his own trap and went to Mrs Prior for a piece of advice.
2019 Beginning Marked The End Of Nick Millican & CH’s Relation
It was the beginning of 2019 when Nick knew that something was off in the relationship and soon it might lead to bizarre consequences. After a failed romance, Nick Millican extended arms in need of help and the personal advisor was ready as always.
January 1st, Mrs Anna Prior sent a consoling message, that advised Nick to be a little selfish as family break-up is a part of the ‘rich tapestry of life’. Anna also arranged an intimate meeting with her husband, where Nick Millican was made aware of the ‘challenges one faces after leaving the spouse’, notably, Anna’s husband did the same before. It is claimed that Anna and her husband saw the relationship as a passage to gain power in the company and hence, were in favor of the same.
However, nothing helped and Nick ended the extra-marital affair by the end of January 2019. After the breakup, Nick Millican suggested Mrs Prior to lay off the assistant, as he found the continuation of CH in the respective designation as unsustainable.
The Convenient Firing By Nick Millican
Taking action on the suggestion, Ms Prior asked CH to “move onwards to other things”. But, the floor slipped her feet when CH denied saying that she was pregnant. CH briefed Nick Millican about the same and intended for an abortion.
Despite the intimacy, Nick Millican expressed “skepticism” and disdained CH’s pregnancy. Later, Nick Millican hired a private detective, just to know that he was wrong. Mr Nick Millican’s ex-lover demanded a pay-out and left the job only after a monetary settlement.
Fallacious Claims Of Maternity Leave By Nick Millican
In October 2019, Nick Millican asserted that during the pregnancy tenure, Mrs Prior could have a maternity leave for as many days as she wanted with full pay. Mrs Prior announced her pregnancy in March and gave birth in October 2020, but never returned back to work.
The reason for the absence of Mrs Prior was a dispute over the destination at which she was supposed to return back to work. In February 2022, she was again called by the firm for her pay-off negotiation, but till this time Mrs Prior made up her mind to drag the Tribunal in the case.
Nick Millican’s Personal Advisor Turned Into A Legal Threat
After the professional dispute, the alliance between Nick Millican and Mrs Prior brutally shattered. Mrs Prior alleged Nick Millican of sex discrimination, harassment, pregnancy discrimination and victimisation. However, the Tribunal dismissed the allegations as Mrs Prior used the situation for her benefitting and was initially happy to help the boss, for workplace favors.
Nick Millican Exempted From His Evils
Yes, the court made the right decision but Nick Millican can not be portrayed as ‘right’ indeed. Confused? Then answer the following questions. The below questions might help us reach a conclusion together.
The Tribunal dismissed the case against Nick but does that emancipate Nick from the actions? Shall he be released from all the evil acts? Is it worth setting him free, without a single penalty against his infidelity?
No matter, if the case loses its grip, Nick Millican is still answerable for his adulterated relationships in the workplace, for utilizing his position in infidelity and for crossing the legal and moral boundaries of civilization.
Conclusion: Nick Millican Must Be Answerable?
Imagine yourself to be a co-worker of CH, where you too report to Mr Nick Millican. Will you be able to perform with full efficiency in this particular scenario? The answer is certainly no. The actions of Nick Millican can not be counted as ‘personal life’ as it affected the professional ambience.
Also, Mrs Prior was at fault but can not be blamed for the moves of Nick. The case was dismissed due to the dubious intentions of Mrs Prior but we can not deny the fact that Nick Millican was engaged in an unethical relationship. However, many would consider CH and Prior equally at fault and that’s true but on no grounds does the guilt of CH make his behavior less apologetic.
We encourage a liberal mindset and a liberal society and therefore most of us keep to ourselves. However, we must not forget that having an affair in the workplace and being reluctant towards the subordinate’s pregnancy is not acceptable in any world on any grounds.
Last but not least, the case depicts the envious world we live in where an employer can buy his employee’s time and soul in exchange of monetary funds called salary and a colleague can bargain the life of other employees for mere perks.
The chief executive and his advisor both must realize their mistake and that’s all that is the need of the hour. A heart-moving realization and a heartfelt apology. A higher position brings higher responsibility and it must be noted by the authoritative personalities. #BeResponsible #knowYourRights #FightForRight