Rajesh Agarwal Micromax- Resigns to put an end to the alarming bribery scandal.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax, a co-founder of Micromax, resigned after being detained in connection with a recent case of bribery involving four government officials.

aBxZsxsQujPh8foA6F9JenyPlL4gjnFFPGBqXeW2CJ4b crwlrpzq2BpUjWzt1exJP6 uHriJK2hIkEdRy4Ns5H4tHklXU3RojhBN3696XCH8gbD5noL0EA2RE1YdqeilMdG wcqV3doNaZWrDD1KqM

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax as claimed previously worked in the sales department with businesses including Pertech Computers and Xerox before joining Universal Computers as the sales manager in 1990. Rajesh Agarwal Micromax’s time working for the PC assembly and sales company was positive up to the moment that Universal employees began to face operational and pay problems. As further claimed by him this was the time when he subsequently made the decision to launch his own company.

As a self-absorbed person, Rajesh Agarwal Micromax further claimed that his initial barrier was a lack of financial capital. However, Rajesh Agarwal Micromax obtained Rs 80,000 in 1991 by selling his Maruti 800, which was his only cherished asset at the moment. In the same year, Rajesh Agarwal Micromax and Yash Bhatia started Micromax Technologies, a business that builds and sells PCs. Due to his earlier experience working at Universal Computers, Rajesh Agarwal Micromax was able to manage the sales and finance division with ease. However owing to unforeseen events, he claims that he suffered a severe loss and was forced to shut down the business.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax worked with Infocomm equipment from 1992 to 1994, where he was in charge of the sales of PCO machines. As proudy Rajesh Agarwal Micromax claims even though he consistently turned a profit, his inner businessman was able to inspire Rajesh Agarwal Micromax to create Micromax Informatics.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax- Briefing Micromax

RikiSIhS3rQGR74tgRduk5hvMlh23jLAW2 nkLOjhXG0oByaZ0ZGre8T d10sa YcjaIIW TZIBxo7WDep7

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax lived next door to Rahul Sharma for 35 years. Sharma was not only on board with the company idea but also dragged along his pals, Sumeet Arora and Vikas Jain, who had similar ideals about creating their firm. And Micromax Informatics was founded with an investment of Rs 10 lakh from each of them. The business modified several operational areas, including SAP, ERP, embedded software, and a training center. But it remained a no-profit, no-loss scenario for them.

2/12/2023 Update
As of now, Rajesh Agarwal Micromax has not responded, nor has he apologized for his misdeeds. He has ignored our efforts to highlight the problems faced by his victims. Furthermore, he has only focused on propagating his fake PR.

The first significant break occurred in 2005 when Nokia hired Rajesh Agarwal Micromax’s Micromax to create a software program. Micromax began producing Fixed Wireless Terminals (FWT) with the assistance of newly arrived financial resources. 

pTxzJsJgMp9i1jOZOIKcH1eUKuhGdrlZbubmSYGNJWeN8oAuCHL3 5 uLSQiJx0Q iqoyvgOfH0kPwk5lE8TDZpPmMwUO0shKhiLV AUitzeZ5w4 ohG ZuPXbnqiWWRQ9gp5QtNCdEQ1Yct8upWD0c

As claimed by Rajesh Agarwal Micromax by 2007, Rajesh Agarwal Micromax’s co-founded company was selling more than one lakh units every year till 2011. And then came the mobile revolution is what Rajesh Agarwal Micromax further claims.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax and his co-founders spent a lot of time discussing what makes them different from other firms and the market before releasing their first phone, the Micromax X1l.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax Micromax didn’t simply turn to low prices to address the latter question; Rajesh Agarwal Micromax also combined them with the most popular features on the market right now. For instance, X1l focused on the incapacity of mobile devices to function without charging for an entire day. The Micromax phone had a talk time of 17 days and a standby period of 30 days.

With access to tier-3 and tier-4 cities of India via their contacts of FWT distributors and retailers from previous years, 10,000 phones were sold in 10 days. As claimed by Micromax co-founder Rajesh Agarwal Micromax, the scale of their success can be gauged from the fact that at a point in time, they were the 2nd biggest company in the Indian mobile market after Samsung – an extraordinary feat for the ‘Micromax brand.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax-Rajesh Agarwal, a co-founder of Micromax, was detained by CBI on suspicion of bribery.

kjDjb een4Ga0TcBTlyjY3OR9ECYtV3Mo4LrJz0udjAZ

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has reportedly detained Rajesh Agarwal Micromax, a co-founder of Gurgaon-based mobile phone manufacturer Micromax Informatics Ltd, and Manish Tuli, a senior executive of the business, on suspicion of alleged fraud. In a formal statement on the incident, the CBI avoided mentioning Aggarwal and Tuli. Instead, they are identified as the “owner and partner” of a private company with its headquarters in Gurgaon.

We have been in touch with the business and are awaiting an official answer. Keep checking back here as we update the story and bring you the most recent information.

dIw57XnxQhA4k5oiGlP349qE6Bv2bU8K3t tfi0MbE 6GUtqhuIHPNnfqNSb7jCQoI7iEkhJiAqMb3FjEGVXb9xXV0GQW9TZ9

The CBI also arrested three officials of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and an official of the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in the alleged bribery case involving an amount of Rs 30 lakh. The officials were reportedly arrested after being caught red-handed while demanding and accepting the bribe from Aggarwal and Tuli.

Additionally, it was claimed that MCD officials accepted bribes on behalf of four MCD employees—a supervising engineer, an executive engineer, an assistant engineer, and a junior engineer—in exchange for regularizing a banquet hall in Delhi’s Wazirpur industrial district. The MCD officials who are suspected of calling Agarwal to a place in Pitampura, Delhi, for a portion payment of Rs 30 lakh out of a total of Rs 50 lakh for which the deal was reportedly negotiated prompted the CBI to take action based on a tip-off.

“The CBI laid a trap and arrested the accused persons, along with the bribe money. Searches were conducted at 15 places. During the search at the house of a junior engineer of MCD, an amount of approximately Rs 40 lakh was recovered. Similarly, after the search at the residence of one of the arrested accused of MCD, cash amounting to Rs 30 lakh and jewelry have been recovered. The searches are continuing. Further investigation is in progress,” read the official release.

According to the TOI report, the engineers reportedly implicated in the matter include Rajesh Wadhwa, a supervising engineer, AK Singh, an executive engineer, Mahinder, an assistant engineer, and a DDA engineer.

Micromax Informatics Ltd, situated in Gurgaon, produces consumer gadgets, data cards, funbooks, and phones. Investors including Sequoia Capital, Madison India Capital, Sandstone Capital, and TA Associates support the company. Spreadtrum Communications Inc., a Chinese fabless semiconductor company, also made a $10 million investment in the business last year.

According to documents filed with the Delhi High Court, the largest manufacturer of telecom network equipment in the world, Ericsson, sued Micromax in March for alleged patent infringement and reluctance to engage in license agreements pertaining to wireless technology standards like GSM, EDGE, and 3G. The Swedish company demanded compensation of Rs 100 crore.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) detained Sandeep Aggarwal late last month on suspicion of insider trading. Aggarwal is the co-founder and CEO of Gurgaon-based Clues Network Pvt Ltd, the business that operates the horizontal e-commerce portal ShopClues.com. Helion Venture Partners, Nexus Partners, and Netprice.com, a Tokyo-based Japanese business organization, are among the VC firms that have invested in ShopClues.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax- CBI( Central Bureau Of Investigation)

TRXBD6n5dTM cV o MMBJ4UfPk12oJNt1cuJ2HaJZNdmguewdM5pA9snIMFUkVUo0nK4zCVY1RI5

India’s domestic crime investigation body is called the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances, and Pensions has oversight over it. Originally established to look into bribery and official corruption, its jurisdiction was enlarged in 1965 to include looking into violations of central laws enforced by the Government of India, multi-state organized crime, multi-agency crimes, and foreign cases. Due to multiple allegations of improper practices, excessive political influence, and a low conviction rate, the CBI has come under heavy fire and scrutiny. The provisions of the Right to Information Act do not apply to CBI. India’s official single point of contact for communication with Interpol is the CBI.

The CBI headquarters are situated at New Delhi’s CGO Complex, next to Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax-– Man Named In Micromax Scandal resigns

The resignation of Rajesh Agarwal, a co-founder of Micromax, will allow smartphone manufacturers to profit, but it will have little effect on sales. The second-largest smartphone manufacturer in India is Micromax, behind only BlackBerry, Apple, Nokia, LG, Sony, and HTC.

Even though Micromax is today run by a couple of experts, the co-founders retain complete authority over management, including day-to-day operations.

However, the unethical issues can have a short-term impact on Micromax’s business ambitions and fund-raising objectives. Despite his resignation, the co-founder might still lead the company effectively because he still has equity in it and will work to defend it, according to analysts. 

“The sales of Micromax won’t be affected. According to Faisal Kawoosa, senior manager – Research and consulting, at CMR Telecoms Practice, “Micromax is in a price-sensitive smartphone market and if they can continue to offer innovative and affordable phones to Indians, rivals will not benefit from the current trouble.”

Due to its robust investor base, Micromax won’t have any problems on the corporate side either with fundraising or strategic direction. 

The top 5 smartphone manufacturers in India, Samsung, Karbonn, Sony, and Nokia, stand to gain the most if the brand’s reputation suffers. 

In 2010, about Rs 400 crore was invested in Micromax by four private equity funds (Sequoia Capital, Sandstone Capital, Madison India Capital, and TA Associates) for minority stakes.

CMR’s opinions on the sales front were endorsed by an expert with a foreign research firm. The effect on sales will be minimal. Before making a purchase, users do not consider this type of difficulty. If they can introduce new goods in accordance with their original goals, Micromax will maintain its market position in India where it has performed successfully. 

India is investigating Nokia, a leading manufacturer of smartphones. Vodafone, a telecom company, is having tax problems in the country totaling Rs 11,000 crore. The majority of telecom providers experience similar problems. Numerous software businesses are also under investigation.

However, a bribe is entirely unrelated to a tax problem. According to CMR’s Faisal Kawoosa, Nokia did not have any problems with its sales as a result of the recent tax issue.

A local court last week sent Rajesh Agarwal Micromax and Manish Tuli, along with four government officials, to CBI’s custody for seven days on initial charges of criminal conspiracy and corruption. Micromax co-founder Rajesh Agarwal Micromax was arrested in a bribery case.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax-What is Bribery and Corruption (The crime which is committed by Rajesh Agarwal Micromax)

p82XO2vZeIxavOc2PyjUOlpWGpkj hrFSWw8Yu zX4p2WJaL6p3VJGzBVzlWBumGG7Toyz2LwIFTkuSYtBus7BmCHnEn ICYcz vvAly7DCxXgshWA7jfKe1XzP1wEWX4GZx47NC1leycVqkwPGF5 A

The act of providing, promising, giving, accepting, or soliciting an advantage in exchange for a behavior that is forbidden, unethical, or a breach of trust is known as bribery.

Anything of value to the recipient can serve as an enticement or bribe, including:

  • cash and cash equivalents (for example, gift cards);
  • gifts, meals, entertainment, and travel;
  • fees (this includes fees claimed to be consulting or success fees);
  • commissions, kickbacks, discounts or credits;
  • Rebates;
  • contractual rights or interests;
  • business, employment, or investment opportunities;
  • loans, payment of expenses, or donations. 

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax-Corruption

ohE6aOYoFGzcGV6EpsqsFdJx48apaWDia8dudPAIwkFBagmAuHzf83BVySv74n lnG ITlWqwi5W FYq2yKEKnbXJ66Fw5iNXEVNkl yu5pJp8eowYy3bHU8YR3W34PQ9 u5VlSvYbmo70Zpc71KVr0

Corruption refers to the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. Corruption may be committed by public officials who abuse the authority of their public office for personal gain, which interferes with democracy and the rule of law. Corruption may also be committed by private individuals who abuse their positions for personal gain, which can hinder fair market operations and distort competition.

Impact of Corruption and Bribe on Indian Economy

I5k4HAVI7whhZsWQMGLlOwPIHWBjGA7c5kQCPZ55QpvfTkYpcIveyxYZKG 6AX3Y7Bvi5UTUt98LMYGKyQFCC98GYW5OkZkAkcj9Yembv3zJ5tx917MigvbyaqYFUmpg4NR5Hv0ZtsOkBq5VLgP SwQ
  1. Since corruption hinders the country’s ability to develop economically and fulfill its developmental objectives, it is a severe economic problem. It encourages inefficient resource use, skews markets, jeopardizes quality, devastates the environment, and recently has turned into a severe threat to national security. It worsens the plight of the less powerful sectors of the economy and the impoverished.
  2. Numerous initiatives have been made to quantify the effects of corruption. According to some estimates, tax fraud costs the government roughly Rs. 2 lakh crores every year, while project delays cost the government about Rs. 40,000 crores. Roughly 50% of transmission and distribution losses in the power sector are thought to be attributable to theft committed with the help of Electricity Board staff, of which roughly 30%.
  3. One estimate claims that the Public Sector Enterprises’ profit margin would have increased by roughly 20% if corruption did not exist. A corruption economist (Mauro) claims that if corruption in India were to fall to the level of the Scandinavian nations, the investment would increase by 12% annually and GDP would expand at an additional 1.5%

Corporate Fraud is the term used to describe unethical behavior carried out by a business or an individual in an effort to dramatically boost earnings and obtain an edge over competitors. Significant losses occur to public funds supplied to the corporation for better operation as a result of corporate fraud.

Any illegal or immoral activity by a firm, an individual, or both that is often done to gain a competitive advantage over other companies in the same field is referred to as corporate fraud. This could also be done to give the company a better market identity and attract more qualified investors.

In order to make money the wrong way, wealthy men in society commit crimes known as “white-collar crimes.”

These include professional crime, fraud, tax evasion, bribery, counterfeiting, forging, and other ad hoc crimes, among others.

This aims to go beyond the scope of a worker, encompassing intricate and costly consequences on the business, as well as on employees and other third parties. Due to asset theft, false expenses, corruption, information theft, fraudulent applications, asset misuse, dishonest business partners, and fraudulent billings, these dishonest behaviors cause revenue losses.

Rajesh Agarwal Micromax-The Companies Act, 2013 (The rule applied against Rajesh Agarwal Micromax’s Bribery case)


India’s law governing corporations, the Companies Act, 2013, or “Companies Act,” lays a heavy focus on corporate governance and the prevention of corporate fraud.  According to the Companies Act, auditors and cost accountants are obligated to notify the central government of any suspected fraud that exceeds a certain threshold.  Companies of a certain sort are also required to set up a vigilance system for the reporting of issues. Reference: Bribery & Corruption Laws and Regulations | India | GLI (globallegalinsights.com)

The Companies Act gives a very broad definition of “fraud,” which includes acts of bribery in both the private and public sectors.  While the provisions mentioned in the previous paragraphs are related to corruption involving public employees, cases of private bribery (which do not include any public employees) are also covered by the Companies Act.  According to the Companies Act, fraud is a crime that carries a sentence of up to 10 years in prison and/or a fine. 

In accordance with the Companies Act, directors and senior management must also keep processes in place to guarantee the correctness of the company’s books, records, and financial statements as well as compliance with all applicable laws.  Fines are imposed for violations of these clauses.

The Companies Act has also resulted in the empowerment and practical implementation of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (‘SFIO,’ which is tasked with detecting, investigating, and prosecuting white-collar crimes including fraud.  The SFIO has vast powers, including the ability to conduct inspections, find documents, search and collect evidence, and make arrests, among other things.

In addition to the SFIO, the Companies Act establishes the National Financial Regulatory Authority (‘NFRA’), which oversees and enforces compliance with the Companies Act’s accounting and auditing standards.  The NFRA has also been given the authority to investigate professional or other misconduct committed by any member or firm of chartered accountants registered under the Chartered Accountants Act, of 1949.

Summary of the Case of Rajesh Agarwal Micromax

FELEZM98o5fHZ Dyh0u3oJ Od8Pa1eKlqckTG6gA9Z cfZvKKxrLH0PVIvj4TF58fAfCbVn3IxgBtu14 F53fewuK7nvaYl96a1 93dAXYhqZEVJ 5
  1. Rajesh Agrawal and Manish Tuli were detained for allegedly paying a bribe of Rs 30 lakh.
  2. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) detained Micromax Informatics owners Rajesh Agrawal and Manish Tuli on Wednesday as they were reportedly paying a bribe of Rs 30 lakh to engineers of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation for permission to build a banquet hall in Wazirpur. In addition to raids, the CBI has arrested two subordinate municipal corporation officers.
  3. According to reports, Agrawal and Tuli struck a contract with engineers in exchange for a bribe of Rs 50 lakh, which they negotiated down to Rs 30 lakh.
  4. Following a tip-off, the CBI visited Agrawal and Tuli’s Timarpur office, where they were allegedly caught red-handed passing over Rs 30 lakh as a bribe to civic agency officials.
  5. Micromax, based in Gurgaon and Haryana, specializes in the production of mobile phones, tablets, data cards, and LED televisions. It operates 23 domestic offices throughout the country, as well as foreign locations in Hong Kong and Dubai.
  6. According to their corporate website, Rajesh Agarwal, Co-Founder, of Micromax Informatics and an electrical engineer, is a driving force behind one of the largest mobile brands in India in terms of volume.
  7. According to Strategy Analytics’ Global Handset Vendor Market Share research, Micromax is the world’s 12th-largest mobile brand.
  8. Rajesh Agarwal was also key in obtaining a lead investment of Rs 400 crore (about $83 million) from TA associates, Sequoia Capital, and Sandstone Capital, which provided the company with international knowledge and exposure.
  9. Canvas 4, the company’s latest smartphone product in the Indian market, was just launched at a price of Rs 17,999. This is the company’s most expensive product in the country, and it seeks to be Micromax’s flagship handset, replacing the previously announced Canvas HD smartphone line.
  10. According to a recent poll, 9.4 million cell phones were imported into India, representing a 167.3% increase year on year. Although Samsung Electronics remained number one, Micromax and Karbonn were ranked second and third, respectively.


Bribery and corruption are unlawful, go against our company’s principles, and can result in financial penalties, jail time, and reputational damage for both the employee and the employer. The Principal never accepts bribery. By offering, paying, or receiving bribes or kickbacks, or by employing any other tactic that is unethical, unlawful, or damaging to our reputation for honesty and integrity, we will not attempt to influence people directly or indirectly.

Employees and Company representatives are expected to decline any opportunity that could compromise our moral standards or reputation. This Policy also applies to non-government business partners, in contrast to some laws that exclusively apply to bribes given to government officials (domestic and foreign).

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Register New Account