Case Study: Akella Chendrasekhar MD
Carroll Wheatcraft is now contesting a hearing court ruling. His medical malpractice suit against Akella Chendrasekhar MD was rejected by the court since it was tardily brought.
It is glad to say that we were able to reverse the ruling & transfer the matter for additional procedures.
Background and Proceedings
Before having gastric bypass surgery, Wheatcraft, a truck driver, weighed 335 pounds. Akella Chendrasekhar MD of the Iowa Clinic, P.C. conducted the procedure.
The main objective of the procedure was to make a more compact pouch by shrinking Wheatcraft’s stomach. Wheatcraft’s body weight varied after the procedure, dropping to an insignificant amount of 247 pounds over the course of his checkups.
However, Wheatcraft reached 279 pounds when he last saw Dr. A C. Wheatcraft’s weight increase might be linked to not adhering to the recommended after-surgery dietary and physical activity routine, Akella Chendrasekhar MD repeatedly underlined to Wheatcraft throughout his post-surgical follow-up appointments.
Although the operation was effective, Akella Chendrasekhar MD emphasized that it did not constitute a permanent fix as ongoing lifestyle adjustments were required to preserve improvement.
Wheatcraft cited an exchange that took place before the end of summer when questioned why he decided to discontinue seeing Dr. A.C. Another individual who experienced a gastric bypass operation & required surgical modification was brought up throughout this discussion.
Wheatcraft consequently scheduled a consultation with Dr. David Coster. Wheatcraft was 301 pounds when he first saw Dr. Coster & was most worried about putting on weight after having gastric bypass surgery.
In agreement with Dr. A.C., Dr. Coster concluded that Wheatcraft’s post-bypass obesity might have been related to a poor diet.
As Dr. Coster put it, I’m not sure exactly what the problem is, but it appears like he might not have gotten enough dietary help and advice.
As a way to check the health and dimensions of his pouch, Dr. Coster prescribed gastrointestinal testing. He additionally understood the special nutritional requirements of drivers of trucks.
Standard of Review
We have a bias in favor of the nonmoving organization when deciding whether a motion for summary judgment is suitable, as shown in the case of Crippen v. City of Cedar Rapids.
In order to spot possible actual conflicts, it also takes into account any logical inference that may be made from the data.
According to the ruling in Garofalo v. Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity, a summary ruling is only permissible when the evidence demonstrates that there are no legitimate disputes concerning significant matters and the party making the motion has the right to victory as a matter of law.
Our main priority is to fix any legal mistakes that can occur throughout the procedures.
Statute of Limitations
Wheatcraft argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment due to a new attribution standard that was implemented following the ruling in a significant Lowa Supreme Court judgment.
This new criterion, developed in Rathje v. Mercy Hosp as well as employed in Murtha v. Cahalan, brings a new viewpoint to the previous consideration of the medical negligence statutes of restrictions.
However, according to Akella Chendrasekhar, this scenario ought to remain consistent as a result of the newly developed causality criterion.
The district court allowed Akella Chendrasekhar’s move for summary dismissal by relying on earlier precedents in the law.
The court ruled that it was irrelevant to know what caused Wheatcraft’s increase in weight & its accompanying illnesses. The law does not address the underlying causes of the issue; it merely mandates acknowledgment of its presence.
The court came to the conclusion that Wheatcraft knew about his injury or ought to have had knowledge of it.
Conclusion
It argues that the given summary judgment has to be overturned on the basis of an analysis. It recommends remanding the matter to the court of appeals to ensure it can use the latest and clearly stated standards.
As an outcome, we vacate the district court’s judgment and order that the case go forward with additional procedures.
What is Medical Malpractice?
Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional fails to provide the appropriate care, takes incorrect actions, or delivers subpar treatment, resulting in harm, injury, or even the loss of life for a patient.
This usually involves an error made in the medical field, whether it’s related to diagnosis, medication dosages, health management, treatment procedures, or post-treatment care.
Patients have the legal right to seek compensation when they have suffered harm due to substandard medical treatment.
According to the Medical Malpractice Center, physicians in the United States face between 15,000 and 19,000 malpractice lawsuits each year.
It’s important to note that the standards and regulations governing medical malpractice vary from one country or state to another. Thus, Akella Chendrasekhar MD is also involved in a medical malpractice lawsuit.
About Akella Chendrasekhar MD
Akella Chendrasekhar MD is a general surgeon in Staten Island, New York, with links to Richmond University Medical Hospital. Dr. Chendrasekhar graduated attended the Medical College of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine & has more than twenty years of work experience in healthcare.
Therefore, during their interactions involving Akella Chendrasekhar MD, certain patients have complained of misdiagnoses, postponed medications, and a general absence of concern.
These concerns call into question the standard of treatment offered by the doctor, necessitating a review of his business. If you want to know more about the doctor, then follow the link: Akella Chendrasekhar MD.
These surgeons are responsible for the failure of the entire medical facility.
It’s hard to believe that this carelessness and inconvenience are still there in the medical field.
In healthcare medical negligence is quite common, as many patients have to suffer a lot and the government needs to work on it.
Surgeons like Akella shocked me, as they have twenty years of experience and still doing the wrong and subpar procedures.
It’s true that surgeons make mistakes, but these cases never came into the limelight.
These surgeons need to be accountable to their patients, as they were charging high fees from the people and the services that were provided were not up to the mark.