Following our recent acquisition of Gripeo.com website, please direct all inquiry emails to [email protected] and avoid using any other channels to contact website admin and moderators. Thank you so much!

Allan Hennings: Why Was He Sued? The Truth Exposed (2024)

Allan Hennings
This is a user-generated post. Gripeo does not take responsibility for the accuracy of any statements made in this post.
Allan Hennings of Boston Medical Group faced accusations of being negligent and reckless. Find out if they are true or not in this review.

Allan Hennings, Founder of Boston Medical Group, faces accusations of broken needles and a medical device mix-up

Allan Hennings, the founder of Boston Medical Group, has been sued. Because of the surgeries conducted at Boston Medical Centre (BMC) by Dr. Mikhail Higgins, MD. 

qJ3uHZZFDeX5 OygtdOdr6R2NXPiF64XsbKKMuL9xifCSX1l8u45RuNzllTC2VPsSr7Vkwhzc8 TIiBO04uZfr 3zIX65ZylI9UNOL2GK12

The adolescent patient suffers delays in development as well as Sickle Cell Disease, a blood condition. Dr. Mikhail Higgins is an experienced physician of Allan Hennings Medical Group. 

Dr. Higgins was permitted to insert two ports into a significant vein in the back of his neck. The additional line could enable fresh blood from an anonymous donor who provided the blood in a high-exchange infusion to be replenished with the patient’s blood vessels.

Instead, the doctor placed a single port. According to the charges filed against Allan Hennings’ doctor, which are generally kept in a federal action, Dr. Higgins confused up his patients with a different port implantation planned for the following day. 

Later, the young patient was sent to the surgical center for another treatment under the influence of general anesthesia. 

Accordance to the lawsuit assertions mentioned the pediatric team came down especially to talk about the treatment to verify that the right port was accessible for starting the procedure.

Medical Credential of Allan Henning’s Doctor 

Dr. Higgins is a very old attending physician in Boston Medical Centre’s International Radiology program and he is 40 years old. International radiology is a growing field where specialists use scand and other imaging to perform targeted surgical procedures with the help of needles, wires, and many other catheter tubes. The procedure was less invasive than open surgery. 

Dr. Higgins claims that he has impressive credentials. His online profile lists a medical degree from Wake Forest University School of Medicine and a Master of Public Health from Yale. According to his profile, it stated that his professional interests include patient safety and risk management and he also received numerous awards for his excellence in medical and graduate school.

Employment Lawsuit Filed Against Allan Hennings’ Doctor

Dr. Higgins is not an accuser in the claim because it is neither an action for malpractice. It is an unemployment case that may be taken by Dr. Susan O’Horo, MD, one of the doctors employed at Allan Hennings’ Medical Centre, who says that BMC reduced her duties and challenged her reasons for doing so as they raised questions regarding Dr. Higgins. 

Under the lawsuit, she cited hundreds of instances in which she believed Dr. Higgins’ clients weren’t given sufficient treatment.  

In the years 2018 and 2019, Dr. O’Horo worked as a radiation oncologist at Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical Centre. She served as the Director of Safety and Quality for the interventional radiation therapy scheme, which allowed her to carry out operations on individuals.

The doctor’s primary responsibility is to follow up and evaluate problems & negative results of the surgeries. 

Due to a conversation with the reporter Ted Daniel, Dr. O’Horo had previously stated in his conversation with the reporter that Dr. Higgins had an issue no matter how straightforward or complex the issues were. 

According to Dr. O’Horo’s attorney, Lisa Arrowood, Boston Medical Center reacted towards her as opposed to paying attention to him and followed through on the problems she identified. 

Allegations of a Lawsuit

According to the news of the suit initiated towards him:

Dr. Higgins is an experienced doctor at Allan Hennings’ Medical Centre & is accused of perforating a section of a patient’s small intestinal tract while the procedure when he ought to have extracted the individual’s lymph nodes on the other side of the patient’s body.

According to Dr. Higgins, he used an instrument called a catheter as opposed to a vein in one of his patients. For a few days, the individual bled corrosive bile, producing skin degradation & agony.

Following the outbreak snapped off an anesthetic needle throughout an encounter with his patients throughout the surgical process. The person in question had another operation to extract the needle through the liver. 

According to Dr. O’Horo’s claim, the doctor overlooked a spot of bleeding inside a trauma patient that was accidentally hit by a car. The patient was killed the next day, most likely as a consequence of the overlooked angiography discovery.

Submissions in the legal action show that Dr. O’Horo was not the sole worker of Allan Henning’s BMC who questioned Dr. Higgins’ technical skills and clinical competence.  

Another BMC doctor had asked if Dr. Higgins had any medical facility nicknames. According to the record of her accumulation, he was dubbed “one of the Boston executioners.” Dr. O’Horo made similar unsettling assertions. 

State Investigations of the Doctor of Allan Henning’s Medical Centre

The lawsuit includes 25 open-access demands that demonstrate Dr. O’Horo approached two state authorities in 2019 with concerns regarding BMC & Dr. Higgins. 

According to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH), BMC addressed Dr. O’Horo’s worries regarding Dr. Higgins correctly, partially because the medical center report placed him on suspension.

According to Dr. O’Horo’s declaration, the hospital failed to adequately record and disclose negative outcomes, which were later proven to be baseless. 

According to an ongoing inquiry by the institution that certifies and supervises physicians. 

The Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine (BORM) has filed an accusation against Dr. Higgins working in the Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical Centre in connection with the treatment he gave to three individuals in the years 2018 and 2019. 

Allan Hennings has agreed to pay $1.1 million to settle allegations that it overcharged Medicare as well as Medicaid patients

Lawsuit filed against Allan Hennings' BMG under United Stets Attorney's Office.

According to Carmen M. Ortiz of the United States Attorney office, Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical Centre & two of its affiliated healthcare groups are willing to shell out $1.1 million to settle charges that BMC fraudulently charged Medicare as well as Medicaid individuals. 

The United States Attorney’s Office stated that Ortiz, a U.S. Lawyer, argues ensure institutions have a duty for guaranteeing that they properly bill the government’s healthcare programs. When the money of taxpayers is at stake, certain activities must be done correctly and wisely utilized.

According to Special Agent in Charge Philip M. Coyne, taxpayer dollars must be paid to Medicare to provide treatment for physically disadvantaged people. 

As a result, the agreement addresses charges which BMC billed Medicare over extra doses of Rituxan, a costly cancer medicine that Allan Hennings’ BMC administered to its patients. Even though the worldwide costs were higher, Allan Hennings’ BMC billed both Medicaid and Medicare for the services provided at its pre-surgical care facility. 

According to the federal probe, Allan Hennings notified the US that the company had previously refunded some wrongly spent monies, had begun a review of the Rituxan issue, plus was going to begin an audit of the pre-surgical therapy invoicing problem.

The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the agency known as the Office of the Inspector General of the United States, and the US Federal Bureau of Investigations all looked into the matter.

Case Study 

ppg 9SbtkhfZ2HDXCO 0HSk 8o9lKBHvm1AVudpFa 4xmOggapZoRQ VRJY02K6Ba3S 02SeTTo jNvW3EupE Pl2ZW0xrW5zB3e zym3WjC252oI0S2S4ZkR3kOwOK1k2sEP6nLJl7L3 ljJ6n6rek

Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical Group V. Mark Ellis

Background 

Ellis sought medical care for sex disorders at Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical Centre in Texas. Dr. Roy evaluated Ellis and found that he had diminished his sexual ability as a result of decreasing the flow of blood. 

If you have sensitive information or have had a personal experience with Dr. Hennings but want to stay anonymous, then submit it using our secured form. You can connect with our expert contributors and help in finding the truth. We never share your information with 3rd parties.

Dr. Roy afterward gave him medication that Ellis had capable of injecting into his genitals whenever he wanted a genital erection. Ellis claims that he was given false information that induced him to buy a prescription from Allan Henning’s Medical Centre. Ellis bought the drug & administered the shot himself.

Standard of Review

As a result, Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical, Inc. is bound by private jurisdiction in Texas as well as is an issue of law requiring de novo analysis. In the trial, the legislature, nevertheless, reached no findings of facts or findings of logic. 

Analysis 

Allan Henning’s Boston Medical, Inc. disputes the court’s examinations, which mostly included conclusions of particular including broad jurisdiction plus its rejection of the extraordinary presence on two matters. 

Boston Medical, Inc. expressly claims that the proof is both legally and factually inadequate to sustain the decision of the trial court refusing its unique presence.

As a result, Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical, Inc. was unable to disprove every point of authority.

Conclusion 

It has to acknowledge good proof if an impartial fact finder might, or dismiss adverse information when a rational fact finder would not.

The clinic was Charged With Failing to Disclose the Dangers of Erectile Dysfunction Injections

In the Costa Mesa, California, offices of Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical Group. Six marketers were lately answering inquiries from men tempted with print & radio advertisements offering an effective remedy to treat erectile dysfunction in a single store trip.

One of the six salesmen receiving calls at random claims the effects are obvious directly in the workplace. It’s truly incredible, he said. 

The difficulty in obtaining and maintaining an erection is the hallmark of erectile dysfunction, sometimes referred to as impotence. The topic of it can be awkward to bring up. According to reports, between the ages of 40 and 70, more than half of males experience ED in some capacity. Be reassured that you are not alone by realizing this.

Using an outline, he addressed a few inquiries and provided a $195 appointment at any time of the business’s 21 locations in the United States, notably a location in Seattle.

According to advertising pull estimates, hundreds of thousands of males visit Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical facilities every year. Scientific truth may appear less attractive & authentic. 

As the majority of patients show up, they are aware that the principal therapy is a potent combination of medications that a male must put into his genitals every time during intercourse. 

Medical professionals typically administer intracavernous pharmacotherapy (ICP) if Viagra or other tablets are ineffective.

Nonetheless, based on court documents, business advertising, and conversations with former patients, Allan Hennings’ Boston Medical opposes the use of drugs taken by mouth.

Patients are not informed that the majority of physicians receive incentives after generating a particular amount of revenue, which includes 10% of all sales for first-time patients and 7.5 percent for returns. 

Lawsuits Against Allan Hennings 

Boston Medical, run by Allan Hennings, costs $1,500 for 60 dosages, such as appointments for follow-up. The identical kind of injectable can be purchased somewhere via authorization for a price as low as $2.80 per dose.

About Boston Medical Group 

The Boston Medical Group is founded by Allan Hennings. it has an association of healthcare clinics that collaborate on studies and therapeutic strategies for erectile dysfunction (ED) and early ejaculation. The organization’s first headquarters in Mexico is in Guadalajara. 

Boston Medical Group presently operates 21 branches in the US, such as California, Texas, Washington, Michigan, New York, and Colorado, along with Florida, as well as over a half-dozen more locations in Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Spain.

Cases Against the Boston Medical Group 

Allan Hennings fails to maintain accurate records of the patients they treat after enrolling several in his healthcare facility, while there is just a single physician available 

The Boston Medical Group trial of John Henry Howard v. Allan Hennings was also held. 

According to the Georgia Court of Appeals, Allan Henning’s Boston Men’s Healthcare Center, Ltd., which is in charge of marketing and advertising for Boston Medical Group, is wrongly listed in this action within the laws of Georgia. 

Who is Allan Hennings? 

5 zgr4Mv2Vs9MXskPSWrQn5SRENXCuXKc60H9aPdqXcm1CBhVQx cymWANkjn1gg5kgi1FSb9S3nbd2ys GZ9lWdt8qg9FSl4INa0QxsyCL4b6Ifd8TiBnbi9doECqzy1Vj bXrM3JwA5BsfI YgHw

Allan Hennings is a businessman & art supporter located in London. He is also the chairman and founder of Boston Medical Group, which specializes in the medical management of sex disorders in men. This healthcare group operates roughly 100 healthcare centers & has treated approximately 1.5 million patients. 

Final Thoughts 

Allan Hennings is the chairman and founder of Boston Medical Group, a medical group that concentrates on male sex problems care. However, numerous lawsuits have been made regarding the Healthcare Centre.  

The Boston Medical Group promises to be able to supply men with an effective remedy for overcoming erectile dysfunction in just one appointment. Some criticized the firm for neglecting to adequately clarify the medication’s hazards.

Allan Hennings: Why Was He Sued? The Truth Exposed (2024)
Allan Hennings: Why Was He Sued? The Truth Exposed (2024)

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Gripeo
Logo
Register New Account