In a recent turn of events, a medical practitioner by the name of Dr. Brian Blick has indicated that he is willing to resolve civil penalty claims relating to allegations that he violated the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 and the rules that went along with it. The inquiry that led to the announcement of the settlement, which has a total value of $95,000, was conducted by the United States Attorney Robert J. Troester.
Time Period Covered by Reported Infractions
The United States of America asserts that the acts of Dr. Brian Blick took place over a considerable amount of time, beginning on March 18, 2020, and ending on March 1, 2022. It is alleged that Dr Brian Blick made orders for prohibited medications destined for the Western Oklahoma Pain Specialists clinic that was situated in Elk City, Oklahoma, during this period of time. On the other hand, the claims state that he did not properly keep records for some of these restricted drug transactions.
You can help us put a stop to online scams before they grow too big and end-up ruining thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, doesn’t matter if it’s big or small. Now that this is out of the way, let’s get started with the review.
Particular Transgressions
The accusations made against Dr. Brian Blick centered primarily on the way he allegedly managed the controlled substance fentanyl, which is classified as a Schedule II drug under the United States Controlled Substances Act.
According to the United States of America, Dr Brian Blick reportedly neglected to keep the necessary DEA 222 order forms that pertained to the procurement of fentanyl. Additionally, it has been claimed that he omitted crucial information from the DEA 222 order forms, specifically the quantities and dates of fentanyl delivered to the Clinic. These allegations suggest that Dr. Blick may have violated federal regulations and failed to exercise proper supervision over the handling of fentanyl, which is a potent and highly addictive narcotic.
We look at 34 different data points when analyzing and rating online money-earning opportunities. Once the research on these data points is submitted, expert contributors reach out to the company’s customers and associates to get more insight into their operation. Finally, all the collected information is presented in the form of this expert review.
All the data is extracted from publicly available information and the sources are given in the transparency section at the bottom of every report.
These reports are made possible by the collective efforts of contributors like you. If you would like to become a contributor then contact us here.
The Terms of the Settlement
In order to put an end to these charges, Dr. Brian Blick has come to an agreement with the United States about a cash compensation in the amount of $95,000. It is essential to emphasize that Dr Brian Blick is not admitting guilt by signing this settlement agreement since this does not represent an admission of culpability. At the same time, the government has not compromised in any way with respect to the veracity of the charges that have been brought up.
Explanation of the Agreement to Settlement
The statement made by the government does not imply any acceptance of guilt. However, it should be noted that the government has not made any concessions regarding the truthfulness of the allegations made against them.
With regards to the agreement to the settlement, all parties involved have mutually agreed that it would be advantageous for all concerned if an agreement were to be reached.
The investigation and subsequent legal proceedings
The Drug Enforcement Administration, specifically the Office of Diversion Control, conducted a thorough and extensive investigation into a particular instance involving regulatory infractions concerning restricted drugs. The investigation was led by Assistant United States Attorneys Ronald R. Gallegos and Amanda R. Johnson, who were also responsible for overseeing the proceedings in the courtroom.
After careful consideration of the evidence, Dr. Brian Blick reached a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs for $95,000, effectively resolving the charges of regulatory infractions. While the parties involved in the settlement agreement neither accept nor deny guilt for the claimed infractions, the agreement’s provisions allowed them to avoid the complexity and uncertainty associated with litigation.
It’s worth noting that the settlement agreement was the result of a collaborative effort between the parties involved and their legal representatives. The agreement’s provisions were designed to ensure fair and just outcomes for all parties, as well as to protect the public’s interest in the safe and responsible use of restricted drugs. Overall, this case highlights the importance of adhering to regulations and the potential consequences of violating them.
Career and Educational Background of Dr. Brian Blick
The case in question emphasizes the significance of complying with regulations regarding the use of restricted drugs. It underscores the potential consequences that individuals and organizations may face when they violate these regulations.
Furthermore, the provisions outlined in the agreement allowed all parties involved, including their respective legal representatives, to avoid litigation. The process was highly collaborative and involved extensive negotiations. Ultimately, the settlement reached was a result of a thorough and unbiased evaluation of the evidence presented.
Educational history
When it comes to linguistics, it can be a complex and confusing topic for many individuals. It is crucial to understand the importance of accurate and efficient language interpretation, especially in situations where people’s safety and well-being are at stake. This is particularly true when dealing with strict drug regulations, as any mishandling or misinterpretation can result in severe consequences. Dr. Barrack Blick, a renowned medical expert from Elk County, Oklahoma, has emphasized the value of precise communication in his field of work. With years of experience and a wealth of knowledge, Dr Brian Blick claimed he has seen firsthand the specific risks and benefits involved in clear and concise language interpretation.
Medical Training
Dr. Brian Blick’s passion for medical research and pursuit of excellence is evident in his impressive educational background and professional development. He embarked on his academic journey at the prestigious University of Oklahoma, where he immersed himself in a rigorous curriculum. As a native of Edmond, Oklahoma, Dr Brian Blick claimed that he was driven to excel and successfully completed his studies. He also claimed that his dedication to learning and commitment to excellence are a testament to his unwavering pursuit of knowledge in the field of medicine.
Residency Education
Growing up in Edmond, Oklahoma, Dr. Brian Blick was a dedicated and determined student. With a strong academic background and an unwavering commitment to excellence, he pursued his studies with great passion. Driven by his thirst for knowledge and desire for success, he completed his undergraduate studies in 2004 and went on to earn a Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
Career in the Profession
Dr Brian Blick and his wife Lauren set up residence in Elk City, Oklahoma, after successfully completing their residency. Here, he took up a crucial position as the Chief of Anaesthesia at the prestigious Western Oklahoma Anaesthesia Consultants-managed Great Plains Regional Medical Centre. Dr Brian Blick claimed that His knowledge and vision in the area of anesthesiology made a substantial difference in the treatment of patients.
Dr. Brian Blick claimed that he founded Western Oklahoma Pain Specialists by using his significant medical expertise and dedication to bettering the lives of his patients. This project demonstrates his commitment to dealing with pain management and providing specialized treatment to the neighborhood.
For more details you can check out the link below –
Below is a review about Dr. Brian Blick you can check it out –
The above person, who recently moved from Colorado to Oklahoma, faced significant hurdles when seeking help for chronic pain. Seeking help from Alliance Health in Woodward, they were told to call Dr. Brian Blick for medical care. Despite their efforts to meet with Dr. Brian Blick Their experience was marked by anger and a lack of response from Dr. Brian Blick’s office.
Initially, they reached out to Dr. Brian Blick via email, giving information about their chronic pain condition. Subsequently, Dr Brian Blick’s office called them and recommended they get in touch with Alliance Health in Woodward. This back-and-forth contact left the individual in a state of confusion and without a clear way to get the necessary medical care.
In an attempt to make an appointment, they called the contact number given for Dr. Blick’s office in Woodward, leaving a note on the answering machine. However, despite their efforts, they did not receive an answer or any follow-up contact from Dr. Blick’s office. This lengthy time of ignored chronic pain naturally caused significant anxiety.
Ultimately, the individual chose to seek care from a different provider in Edmond, in an effort to ease their suffering. They had only one meeting with this new provider, who then suggested visiting the Enid office due to its closer closeness to Woodward.
Throughout this experience, it appeared that their efforts to receive care from Dr. Brian Blick were met with challenges, including a lack of response and trouble in getting an appointment. The individual’s experience left them feeling that their pain and well-being were not properly handled, raising questions about the level of care and worry given by Dr Brian Blick’s office.
The Bottom Line
The civil penalty settlement against Dr. Brian Blick recently highlights the importance of complying with regulations, as non-compliance can result in significant consequences. However, there may be repercussions if the settlement is not appropriate or adequate. It is crucial to ensure that such settlements are fair and just for all parties involved, including the public. Apart from the review’s point of view, I can say that he is not a good doctor as his client has faced many challenges in contracting him.
