You can help us put a stop to online scams before they grow too big and end up ruining thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, doesn’t matter if it’s big or small. Now that this is out of the way, let’s get started with the review.
In the realm of financial crime, few cases have been as intricate and impactful as that of Justin Esposito.
This article delves into the elaborate securities fraud operation masterminded by Justin Esposito and his accomplices, shedding light on its complex structure, the devastating financial consequences it caused, and the legal repercussions that followed.
We look at 34 different data points when analyzing and rating online money-earning opportunities. Once the research on these data points is submitted, expert contributors reach out to the company’s customers and associates to get more insight into their operation. Finally, all the collected information is presented in the form of this expert review.
All the data is extracted from publicly available information and the sources are given in the transparency section at the bottom of every report.
These reports are made possible by the collective efforts of contributors like you. If you would like to become a contributor then contact us here.
The Roots of Deception: An Overview of Justin Esposito’s Fraud Scheme
Justin Esposito’s fraudulent venture mushroomed into a multi-million dollar scheme that wreaked havoc on the financial lives of numerous investors. Essentially, Justin Esposito and his cohorts orchestrated a penny-stock fraud operation that resulted in a staggering $39 million loss for unsuspecting investors.
According to FBI records, Justin Esposito was a key figure in a complex scheme to swindle customers using penny shares, which was prosecuted in a federal district court.
Jason Cope, for example, has been charged with planning that pump-and-dump fraud scam.
Participants like Justin Esposito, in these kinds of scams artificially raise the organization’s stock value. This strategy additionally enables prospective investors to make a profit on their investments before escaping. As a result, investors end up with nearly useless assets.
According to court documents, the president of Worldbridge Partners, Mr Cope, alleges that he conducted this inquiry in 2018 with the assistance of the detectives who probed the proceedings of Kensington Leasing Ltd., Lustros Ltd., & Casablanca Mining.
According to the Prosecutors’ claim, Justin Esposito and other scammers led a total of $54 million to be put into it, resulting in a loss of approximately $27 million. They earned $7.6 million using that deception strategy.
Justin Esposito, along with Cope and others, has been charged with conspiracy, fraud in the securities industry, breaking the law, as well as numerous other charges of deception.
Justin Esposito’s role in the plot revolved around cold-calling potential investors and selling them stock in public companies that he was well aware were being manipulated. For his part in the deceit, Justin Esposito received commission payments from his co-conspirators.
The Financial Litigation Program’s Role in Restitution
In the aftermath of the scam, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Ohio, through its Financial Litigation Program (FLP), played a crucial role in ensuring that justice was served. The FLP successfully collected full restitution for $624,122.15 from Justin Esposito, a significant victory for the defrauded investors.
According to information from the US Attorney’s Office, the summons of the verdict was largely met and granted for Justin Esposito of Thornwood, New York. Throughout this inquiry into a penny-stock fraudulent activity, Justin Esposito with many other fraudsters had a connection. The overall loss of participants of $39 million was proven in the Northern District of Ohio in this Ponzi scheme.
Because Justin Esposito is an affiliate of this scam operation, he chose to speak with all possible buyers and offer all of the shares to different publicly traded companies that have been controlled.
According to the court’s decision, Justin Esposito must repay those who invested $624,122.15.
The Investigation and Conviction of Justin Esposito’s Misdeeds
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) spearheaded the investigation into Justin Esposito’s financial misdeeds. In 2016, Justin Esposito and his co-defendants were found guilty of orchestrating the securities fraud scheme. Following the conviction, in January 2017, Justin Esposito was ordered to pay the aforementioned sum in restitution for his role in the scheme.
The FBI is looking into this issue & believes that Justin Esposito must refund the investors who have experienced losses. As a result, the loss amount was remitted to the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund.
Prosecution and Enforcement
The criminal prosecution of the case was handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian M. McDonough, while Assistant U.S. Attorney Suzana K. Koch managed the financial litigation. The U.S. Attorney’s Office, responsible for enforcing and collecting civil and criminal debts owed to the U.S. and criminal debts owed to federal crime victims, played a pivotal role in the case.
The Impact of the Fraud
The victims of the fraud scheme suffered a significant financial loss. While restitution is paid to the victim, criminal fines and felony assessments are paid to the Department’s Crime Victims Fund. This fund distributes the collected monies to federal and state victim compensation and victim assistance programs.
The overall loss of victims as a result of this fraud scheme is $39 million, including penalties & criminal charges paid to the Department of Crime Victims Fund at the moment of restoration.
The Repercussions: Asset Forfeiture and Its Role in Restoring Funds
Forfeited assets from such cases are deposited into the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund. This fund is crucial as it is used to restore funds to crime victims and for various law enforcement purposes.
A Case Study
In a parallel case, Jason Cope, the president of Worldbridge Partners, was accused of leading a similar “pump-and-dump” scheme like Justin Esposito, Cope, and his team artificially inflated the stock price of a company, sold off their holdings for a considerable profit, and then absconded, leaving the victims with nearly worthless stocks.
Legal Precedence
In a recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the court affirmed a judgment against Angelique de Maison, another participant in a similar securities fraud scheme. The court ordered de Maison to disgorge her net profits from the violation and imposed a substantial civil penalty.
This case underscores the judiciary’s commitment to holding perpetrators of such schemes accountable for their actions. Justin Esposito was ultimately found guilty, according to the court’s pronouncement.
The Public’s Role in Exposing and Combating Fraud Schemes
In the face of such intricate and damaging scams, public vigilance and action are of utmost importance. It is incumbent on every reader to share this information, to help bring the misdeeds of individuals like Justin Justin Esposito to light, and to participate in the fight against such destructive financial crimes.
The victims of these scams continue to suffer the effects of financial loss, and it is our collective duty to ensure that the perpetrators are held accountable. Justin Esposito and his ilk should not be allowed to escape unscathed while their victims bear the brunt of their actions. We demand a higher standard of accountability, and we call for a public apology from Justin Esposito and his co-conspirators.
Get Justice Suspicious
In Conclusion
While this article sheds light on the intricate web of deception spun by Justin Esposito and his co-conspirators, it is essential to remember that knowledge alone is not enough.
As a result, Justin Esposito, along with Code and others, came to public prominence in 2012, after they retracted a one-million-dollar gift to an investor named Kent State. The student’s publication then started to inquire into his previous occupations & connections. He ran into difficulty with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the beginning of 1998.
It is only through collective action that we can hope to prevent such scams in the future and ensure that justice is served. Let’s work together to make a difference.
