Dr. James Farley – Did He Defraud Others? The Truth Exposed (Update 2024)
Dr. James Farley claims he has been the founder, CEO, and president of the MFC Center for Health since 1995. Being so self-absorbed Dr. James Farley claims that he has consulted with over 8,100 patients, cared for over 5,200 patients, and provided approximately 225,000 treatments. These patients range from over 18 countries, 38 states, and 64 counties. Dr.James Farley considers himself to be one of the top doctors in his field by many of his peers.
You can help us put a stop to online scams before they grow too big and end-up ruining thousands of lives. A scam is a scam, doesn’t matter if it’s big or small. Now that this is out of the way, let’s get started with the review.
As claimed and described by Dr. James Farley, he also started writing books in 2012. He is the author of five books in total: Creating healABILITY, 3rd edition, 2019, Creating healABILITY for Parkinson’s, 2016, Creating healABILITY for the Thyroid, 2019, Creating healABILITY for Physician Directed Health/Weight/Fat Loss, and Creating healABILITY for Depression, Anxiety, Bipolar, Schizophrenia, and PTSD, which will be published soon.
Being a mediatic Dr. James Farley also claims that he has previously given guest lectures at GNC locations as well as other businesses, gyms, and organizations for women. Additionally, Dr. James Farley served as the on-site corporate physician for the G.O.D. trucking company’s 400+ employees. Dr. James Farley also claims that he has done radio interviews, radio ads, and television commercials, and he also publishes a weekly blog that is based on current science.
As described by Dr. James Farley, he graduated from Ramapo College of New Jersey with a Bachelor of Arts in 1990, and Park University awarded him a Bachelor of Health Sciences in 1991 (awarded in 2016). In 1995, he graduated with honors from New York Chiropractic College as a doctor of chiropractic. The University of Bridgeport awarded Dr. James Farley a master’s degree in human nutrition in 1996, after which he continued his education. Dr. James Farley is a Fellow of the American Association of Integrative Medicine and a board-certified specialist in integrative medicine.
Showcasing himself as being socialistic Dr. James Farley claims that he is a member of the Endocrine Society, a good-standing member of the Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies (FOCIS), a member of the American Neurological Association, a charter member of the International Association of Functional Neurology and Rehabilitation, a member of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, a member of the Infectious Disease Society of America, a fellow at the American Institute of Stress, and one of only 32 medical professionals in the world who has earned this designation.
From 1996 to 2002, he served as a Diplomate of both the American Clinical Board of Nutrition and the Certification Board for Nutrition Specialists. Dr. James Farley has finished postgraduate studies in infertility, prenatal care, maternal health, clinical strategies, and treatment applications. He also claims that he has a certified office for peripheral neuropathy.
Delighted and proud of his medical professional qualifications, Dr. James Farley claims that he is one of a select group of medical professionals who invest many hours in continuing education courses in functional blood work, laboratory analysis, functional neurology, autoimmunity, endocrinology, thyroid, the brain, and neurotransmitters. Additionally, dietary, endocrine, immunological, and nutritional factors are taken into account while diagnosing and treating neurobehavioral disorders.
We look at 34 different data points when analyzing and rating online money-earning opportunities. Once the research on these data points is submitted, expert contributors reach out to the company’s customers and associates to get more insight into their operation. Finally, all the collected information is presented in the form of this expert review.
All the data is extracted from publicly available information and the sources are given in the transparency section at the bottom of every report.
These reports are made possible by the collective efforts of contributors like you. If you would like to become a contributor then contact us here.
Dr. James Farley also asserts that he received training at the Carrick Institute for a Diplomate in Functional Neurology and for the American Board of Childhood Development Disorders. Flaunting his medical success Dr. James Farley claims that he always has a waiting list for patients who have chronic and difficult immunological, endocrine, and neurological problems to consult and visit with Dr. James Farley in his office in New Jersey, which he started from scratch in 1995. Dr. James Farley flaunts himself to be the proprietor and director of the Bridgewater New Jersey clinic MFC Center for Health.
Explicitly demonstrating his family Dr. James Farley claims to be a happily married person with his beautiful wife Susan since 1986 and has three wonderful children. Dr. James Farley claims to have a successful and happy family life and enjoys time with his family, soccer, running, the New Jersey shore, cross-training, and meditation, and is forever open to learning but let’s see further what the actual reality of Dr. Farley is.
Dr. James Farley- Revocation of the License
The New Jersey State Board of Education was notified of this issue.
Chiropractic Examiners (” Board”) by Acting Attorney General of New Jersey John J. Hoffman and Deputy Attorney General Christopher Salloum
Following information that James Farley, D. C. (“Respondent”) had broken several laws and rules governing the behavior of licensed chiropractors in the State of New Jersey, the Attorney General made an appearance.
Case Description
These accusations are supported by records that are in the Board’s possession and testimony that Respondent gave to the Board’s investigative committees on three different occasions. In particular, on October 18, 2007, the respondent testified before a Board Preliminary Investigative Committee (“PIC”) while being represented by counsel. Dr. James Farley did so in relation to advertising he had planned to have published in a nearby newspaper on or before August 2007.
These adverts for a free report that exposed the “untold story” of fibromyalgia pain appeared in the Daily Record. Readers and patients were instructed to call or go online to receive a free copy of the ten-page report. The respondent sent the report after getting such a request.
The paper itself is used as a promotional tool for chiropractic treatments. According to the claim, there is a “secret” procedure that can be used that will “shock and delight” patients and “possibly wake you up from your fibromyalgia nightmare and end your suffering FOREVER!! ” According to the report, Dr. James Farley wrote the report and it took Respondent “months to write.” The report claimed that the Respondent had found this treatment after searching for it for years. The report claimed that the secret treatment was unique and not available elsewhere.
This report was not written by the respondent. Instead, Respondent bought it from a different chiropractor. The respondent didn’t spend years doing research or looking for this treatment.
Respondent treats people with fibromyalgia outside of Respondent’s office. The PIC thought that the Respondent’s advertisement tactics were deceptive and contained false statements.
Dr. James Farley, the respondent made a second appearance and gave testimony before the PIC on February 18, 2010, this time with legal representation. This time, the respondent was asked about how he treated patient J. P., his record-keeping procedures, how he used the laser therapy method, and how he handled his Medicare and Medicaid billing. Following this appearance, the PIC was of the opinion that the Respondent kept insufficient records of his treatment of J. P., overcharged Medicare-eligible patients for some services, and gave cold laser therapy without having the necessary awareness of its contraindications.
Respondent made a third appearance before the PIC on May 26, 2011, this time with legal representation. He was questioned on that day about a February 2, 2011, New Jersey Star-Ledger ad he had bought, his care of patient B. L., and his record-keeping and billing procedures. Even though Respondent only had 65 of the 300 credits needed to be eligible to take the test given by the American Chiropractic Neurology Board, the Star-Ledger advertisement referred to Respondent as a “Board Eligible Chiropractic Neurologist (in training)”.
The PIC believed that Respondent had performed insufficient diagnostic testing, had kept insufficient records of B. L.’s treatment, and lacked sufficient knowledge of the contraindications for VAX- 0. These issues are related to patient B. L., who Respondent diagnosed with spinal stenosis and then treated with a form of spinal decompression known as VAX- 0. The PIC was further troubled by the Respondent’s correspondence with B. L.’s lack of clarity regarding the sum she would be charged for the services he rendered.
As previously stated, the testimony provided by the respondent during his three appearances before the Board’s investigative committee and the documentation in the Board’s possession show that the respondent was ineffective in his treatment of patients B. L. and J. P. in that he lacked the necessary knowledge of contraindications and precautions regarding the low laser treatment he provided.
Respondent also failed to comply with N. J. A. C. 13: 44E- 2. 2, which establishes the standards for preparing and maintaining patient records, and lacked knowledge of contraindications to performing VAX- D and spinal decompression, and failed to provide support for his diagnoses in violation of N. J . S . A. 4 5: 1- 21 (c) and (d);
Respondent routinely overbilled Medicared eligible patients in violation of N. J . S . A. 45: 1- 21(e); and Respondent violated N. J . A. C. 13: 44E- 2 . l(c) et seq . by causing to be disseminated false and misleading advertisements that he 1) was ” Board Eligible ” when he was not actually eligible to sit for the American Chiropractic Neurology Board ( “ACNB” ) examination and 2 ) had authored a report on fibromyalgia that he did not actually author in violation of N. J . S . A. 45: 1- 21(h) and (o).
Respondent and the Board, both desirous of resolving this matter without formal proceedings, consent and agree to each and every term of this Consent Order. The Board is satisfied that entry of this Consent Order is adequately protective of the public health, safety, and welfare, and being satisfied that good cause exists for entry of the within Order,
Order Agreement
- Respondent James Farley, D. C. 2015, is hereby formally reprimanded for the violations of Board statutes and regulations detailed above.
- Respondent is hereby assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $15, 000, pursuant to N. J . S . A. 45: 1- 25.
- Respondent shall reimburse the Board for costs in the amount of $975, pursuant to N. J . S . A. 45: 1- 25(d).
- The Payment for all penalties and costs set forth above in paragraphs 4 and 5 shall be made by wire transfer, or by bank check, money order, or certified check and made payable to the State of New Jersey and sent to Lisa Tadeo, Executive Director, New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners, P . O. Box 45004, 124 Halsey St ., Newark, NJ 07101, within thirty days of the date of filing of this Consent Order. Any payment in a form other than those noted above will be rejected and returned to the sender. Subsequent violations will subject Respondent to enhanced penalties pursuant to N. J . S . A. 45: 1- 25.
- Within six months of this Order’s entry, the Respondent must successfully fulfill 36 continuing chiropractic education requirements. The continuing education requirements must include twelve (12) hours of spinal decompression training.
- The continuing education coursework must be approved by the Board in writing prior to attendance and will be taken in addition to the respondent’s regularly scheduled continuing education hours. Within thirty (30) days of each course’s conclusion, the respondent must present documentation of its successful completion. Successful completion is defined as attendance at all sessions, the completion of all assignments in a timely manner, and the achievement of an unqualified passing grade.
- Additionally, it is the responsibility of the respondent to make sure that the Board receives written confirmation from the course provider(s) of each of the courses mentioned above that the respondent enrolled in and successfully finished.
- Respondent shall be responsible for paying any costs associated with complying with this Order; in no event shall the Board be responsible for such costs.
- Respondent must also abide by the “Directives Applicable to Any Chiropractic Board Licensee Who is Suspended, Revoked or Whose Surrender of Licensure has been Accepted” (the “Directives”), which are attached.
- The parties agree that the entry of this Order shall not preclude further action, investigation, or restrictions arising from Respondent’s conduct prior to the entry of this Order by this Board, the Attorney General, the Director of the Division of Consumer Affairs, or other law enforcement entities.
- In accordance with N. J. A. C. 13: 45C- l. l et seq. for failing to comply with an Order of the Board, future disciplinary actions may be taken if any term of this Consent Order is not followed.
Reference- Scanned Document (njconsumeraffairs.gov)
Dr. James Farley- False Advertising (The crime committed by Dr. James Farley)
False advertising is the act of willfully (or negligently) making a false claim or statement in an advertisement and printing, sending, or otherwise publicly disseminating it in order to promote the sale of real estate, goods, or services. If the advertising intentionally misleads the consumer as opposed to doing so accidentally, a false advertisement might be considered deceptive. Many governments impose restrictions on fraudulent advertising.
Wrapping Up with some points to be noted to combat False Advertising
- Support your claims.
Making sure all claims made in advertising are accurate and verifiable is one of the most crucial steps that firms can take to prevent fraudulent advertising claims. This indicates that the company can offer proof of the claim, such as research papers or other statistics. Advertisers should refrain from making claims in their advertisements if they cannot back them up with evidence.
- Use language that is unambiguous and clear.
To prevent any misconceptions or confusion, advertisers should utilize plain language in their advertisements. Avoid using any terminology that is ambiguous or overly general since it could lead to conflicting interpretations. Additionally, businesses should refrain from utilizing language that is difficult to grasp by regular customers.
- Comparative assertions should only be used when they are true.
Comparative advertising statements like “our product is better/cheaper than our competitors” can be quite persuasive. They must, however, be accurate and sincere. Businesses should refrain from making unsubstantiated, inflated comparative claims. They must be founded on verified, real information.
- Divulge pertinent information
Any relevant information that might influence a consumer’s (i.e., a private individual’s) choice to buy a good or service should be disclosed by advertisers. Any information required for the consumer to make an informed choice falls under this category. Advertisers must be open and honest about any restrictions or limitations as well as any possible dangers or negative effects.
- Be aware of endorsement and testimonial guidelines
If a business uses endorsements or testimonials in its advertising, it must comply with ASA guidelines. This means ensuring that any endorsements and testimonials are truthful and not misleading and disclosing any material connections between the endorser and the business.
Bottom Line
In conclusion, it’s critical to take precautions to prevent creating false statements because doing so might have substantial legal repercussions for firms. Advertisers should provide evidence for their claims, speak clearly and unambiguously, avoid making unfair comparisons, and provide any relevant information. We saw that this was not the case for Dr. James Farley which caused him abrogation for a lifetime. Businesses can design efficient, legal advertising campaigns that target their target market by adhering to these rules.
