Evgeny Kireev- Accused of hacking for Putin’s spies. (2024)

Evgeny Kireev– Deputy Prime Minister Marat Khusnullin’s family empire continues to grow and extend into new industries. Recently, it has come to light that the Khusnullin family is closely affiliated with Nikolai Tokarev’s Transneft and also has a stake in the Novorossiysk Commercial Sea Port.

Nasha Versiya recently discussed how the son of Deputy Prime Minister Albert Khusnullin developed a massive agricultural enterprise in Tatarstan in a matter of months. Apparently, Alina Khusnullina’s (married to Kireev) daughter does not lag behind her brother, contributing significantly to the expansion of the Khusnullins’ commercial empire.

Evgeny Kireev claims that he is a Limassol-based Cypriot businessman and investor with diverse interests in the automotive, healthcare, and technology sectors. Evgeny Kireev claims to be an angel investor with a diversified portfolio that includes anything from fresh food and beverage businesses to established designers and manufacturers of high-tech vehicles in the motorsport field. 

This investment interest in the automotive business mirrors his personal passion for motor racing, which Evgeny Kireev performs in rally and GT categories on a regular basis, including some of the most famous and hard international 24H race events.

Evgeny Kireev claims to be well-versed in the field of engineering. Evgeny Kireev’s educational history includes a BEng degree in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Kings College in London, followed by an MSc in Engineering Process Management. Showing off his academic achievements Evgeny Kireev claims and asserts that this academic background undoubtedly helped him when assessing possible investments with significant technical and technological components.

Evgeny Kireev claims to have substantial expertise in logistics and supply, as well as the corporate sector, prior to his studies in London, while working for Cyprus’ largest shipping company. Being so self-absorbed person, Evgeny Kireev describes and takes pride in mentioning that his portfolio reflects his diverse skills and interests, with investments in beauty and cosmetics, marketing platforms, educational software, and the rapidly rising vaporizer industry among others. Evgeny Kireev’s choices have a common thread of innovative technologies while maintaining a firm focus on social and environmental responsibility.

Highlighting and taking pride in his business interests Evgeny Kireev claims to enjoy scuba diving and motorsports. Evgeny Kireev claims that he actively competes as a rally and GT category driver, which fuels his desire for high-octane battles. Evgeny Kireev asserts that his ventures include high-tech vehicle development initiatives in the automotive business, perfectly combining his personal enthusiasm for autos with his refined engineering skills.

Evgeny Kireev- “Dossier”: Marat Khusnullin’s daughter owns a network of offshore companies

The Dossier Center discovered that the daughter of Russian Federation Deputy Prime Minister for Construction Policy Marat Khusnullin possesses a vast network of offshore corporations. Investigators identified an estate in Paris, a residence in Cyprus, a business on the Cote d’Azur, and other property purchased through this offshore network by Khusnullin’s relatives.

Alina Khusnullina, Evgeny Kireev’s wife, lives in Cyprus. Evgeny Kireev, her spouse, is the son of Sergey Kireev, Director General of the Novorossiysk Commercial Sea Port. Evgeny Kireev is a Cypriot, according to the Dossier source.

According to the investigators, Alina and Evgeny Kireev possess a magnificent three-story property in Cyprus with a swimming pool, a garden, a gazebo, and the same bathhouse at the end of the site. The home has a total area of about 1,000 square meters, and the land has a total area of 1720 square meters. It is situated in one of Limassol’s most posh suburbs. According to several real estate adverts, the President of Cyprus’s mansion is in the same neighborhood. Dossier has assessed the cost of this villa at 4.5 million euros based on average prices per square meter in the neighborhood.

Alina Kireeva represents the Fortress Group of Companies, which Dossier claims is a real offshore network of the Khusnullins-Kireev family office.

Cypriot Fortress Nominees, Fortress Secretarial, Fortress (Far East) CY, Belize-based Fortress Services Belize, and Hong Kong-based Fortress (Far East) are the group’s five flagship entities. They grouped together 37 offshore firms.

Companies are officially involved in a variety of activities, including transportation, investing, business management, and real estate. What they are doing is unknown, according to investigators. They claim that these firms are required to conceal real estate, taxes, and money transferred to offshore accounts in the interests of both Sergei Kireev and Marat Khusnullin.

According to the publication’s source, the Deputy Prime Minister might assist Sergei Kireev in laundering illegal funds through links in the construction industry.

According to the Dossier, Evgeny Kireev stacked offshore firms on top of one another so that the genuine owners could not be identified. Investigators drew attention to the fact that in August 2022, one of the offshore – Stamukha Shipping Limited – purchased a 30.5-meter yacht of the Yacht AB-100 model from Italy from a certain Loginov Roman Nikolaevich in Sochi and resold it two days later to NCSP Fleet JSC in Novorossiysk.  

NCSP Fleet is a state-owned company. She is engaged in servicing the ships of the largest port operator in Russia. Investigators suggest that the purchase was likely made in favor of the head of NCSP Sergey Kireev, matchmaker Marat Khusnullin, or someone else in this company.

The yacht costs 11 million euros for baseline equipment and 12.5 million euros for customized equipment. According to Dossier, the price in ruble terms will be around 682 million rubles at the time of the sale.

The Fortress Group also made additional significant transactions. Maxadona Investments Ltd. purchased the real estate agency SCI Lares from former banker Yuri Milyukov in 2017. It documented an old mansion in Vineuil-Saint-Firmain, a commune 20 kilometers from Paris. The estate costs 2.35 million euros, or 164.5 million rubles. Because Maxadona Investments is a subsidiary of the Fortress group of enterprises, the investigators infer that the Kireev-Khusnullin family is the ultimate owner.

The investigators also discovered that his relative Ildus Minnikhanov purchased the Azur Life real estate agency in 2015 while working as an adviser to Vice Mayor Khusnullin. Azur Life facilitates the purchase and leasing of flats and villas throughout the Cote d’Azur. Minnikhanov sold his interest to Azur Life co-owner Natalia Vinogradova in June 2022. Vinogradova paid 498 euros for 60% of the shares, which is several times less than the monthly rent for any of the agency’s units. According to Dossier, the agency’s true beneficiaries are the Minnikhanov family.

Evgeny Kireev- This $500 million Russian cyber tycoon planned to go public, but America accused him of hacking for Putin’s spies.

The businessman whose Positive Technologies was recently sanctioned by the US maintains he simply wants to help protect all businesses from hackers. Security officials in the United States are skeptical. 

The city was besieged. Hackers had disrupted the country’s electrical and oil output, exploded a gas station, and dropped a shipping container on a barge at the port. The bloodshed, however, was restricted since it occurred in a model city, an ersatz modern metropolis in miniature. It was a fictitious cyberwar between “red team” hackers and “blue team” defenders, staged in a conference room at a Moscow hotel and overseen by Yury Maksimov, the 43-year-old majority owner of Positive Technologies, which had hosted the competition for a decade.

Maksimov, who Forbes Russia recently estimated to be worth half a billion, had been preparing to take his Moscow-based company public, possibly on an American exchange, just a month before the exercise at Positive’s well-known May Hack Days conference. With his 55% interest and the firm appraised at $2.5 billion by banks working on an initial public offering, Maksimov stood to become a billionaire when the IPO went public. “Being a billionaire is about more than money. “It’s a clear sign of success, of one’s capability and power in this world,” Maksimov says. It would serve as “confirmation of my success and an investment in my future success.”

Positive Technologies Standoff cyber hacking competition is held every year in Moscow. A Carnegie Mellon team won one year but no Americans turned up to this year’s event, which took place after it was hit with sanctions.

However, the IPO preparations were thwarted (at least temporarily) in April when the US Treasury Department sanctioned Positive Technologies and five other companies for allegedly assisting Russian intelligence agencies in executing “dangerous and disruptive cyberattacks.” Maksimov’s company stood out because it was the only one with an international reputation, thanks in large part to relationships with Microsoft, IBM, and Samsung, and it was valued at a little over $60 million.

In 2020, the company expects to generate millions in publicly stated revenue. (The corporation informs Forbes that overall revenues, including non-public entities, are around $77 million.)

According to the Treasury Department, the Positive Hack Days conference was also used as a kind of recruitment fair for Russian military intelligence. While the government provided scant details, the most damaging allegations against Positive were contained in a March study by the Atlantic Council, a powerful Washington D.C. think tank. Though it did not mention Positive by name, the study referenced an entity with the cryptonym ENFER, which was confirmed as Positive by two cybersecurity industry specialists with knowledge of the report who spoke on the condition of anonymity. (Previous links were reported by Kim Zetter, an independent journalist.

The Atlantic Council stated that it could not comment on Enfer’s genuine identity.) According to the article, Enfer created digital spy tools for the FSB, a successor agency. The Atlantic Council said it couldn’t comment on the true identity of Enfer.)

The report said Enfer had developed digital spy tools for the FSB, a successor agency to the Russian KGB, including developing technologies to geo-locate phones by exploiting weaknesses in the global telecom infrastructure. The report also said that after Enfer investigated an attack by a Western country on a Russian government network between 2014 and 2015, it repurposed the malware “for use in other intrusions.”

Maksimov categorically denies the claims made by the Treasury Department and the Atlantic Council. Speaking from Positive’s Moscow office, he claims that his company has never been involved in a geopolitical conflict: “We have never participated in any attacks directed at companies or states.” 

Maksimov does not deny that Positive works with Russia’s Ministry of Defense and FSB, but he claims that Positive exclusively provides defensive assistance to the agencies. “They [the Ministry of Defense] can call us and ask us to hack their defenses,” he says, referring to finding flaws in its own networks rather than those of others. Just 1.5% of Positive’s business comes from military and law enforcement customers, he adds, contending that most of its revenue is from 320 of the largest private companies in Russia, including Sberbank and Lukoil. “In the U.S., Homeland Security and the FBI also have defense concerns, and we’d be happy to serve them as well,” Maksimov says.

His assertions of innocence are not believed by American security professionals. According to James Lewis, a former State Department political advisor and senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Russian cyber businesses have no choice but to perform the bidding of the Kremlin and its security apparatus. “It is impossible to work in this space and not have a relationship with the Russian security services,” Lewis writes in a message. “The security services work closely with hackers,” according to him. Because of Russian corruption, there are fewer legitimate business opportunities in technology than in the United States.” You can travel to Silicon Valley from here. There are significantly fewer options.”

What distinguishes Russian contractors from their American counterparts is their willingness to act “more like a proxy entity,” carrying out hacking campaigns on their own, rather than simply providing tools for cyberattacks, according to Trey Herr, director of the Atlantic Council’s Cyber Statecraft Initiative and one of the report’s authors.

“There is a great deal of hand-wringing, deliberation, and debate about how to proceed with this type of sanction,” says a former senior FBI official familiar with the government’s Positive investigation. “This is not something to take lightly.”

When the United States government… reaches a conclusion like this, they have high confidence that there are personnel within these specific companies working on behalf of the Russian government. When the U.S. government makes a determination like this, they have high confidence that there are individuals within these specific companies that are working either on behalf of the Russian intelligence services, have an active relationship with them, or are essentially enabled to engage in activity

Maksimov admits that the sanctions have jeopardized the company’s ambitions for an IPO by making it extremely unlikely that American investors will participate. According to the Treasury, U.S. firms or people are forbidden from making “any contribution or provision of funds” to the sanctioned parties, which also included a few additional Russian companies. “They have certainly impacted our IPO plans,” he asserts. “Because American funds very often participate in IPOs and have a penchant for high-tech investment, and obviously they won’t be on the roster.” 

Meanwhile, Microsoft has removed Positive from its partnership program that gives early warning of software vulnerabilities, saying to the Associated Press in April that it was in compliance with all restrictions. According to an IBM representative, the company is also complying with the penalties, and its engagement with Positive is limited to product integration.

Because of the sanctions, it is no longer working with Positive on certain integrations, noting, “Positive Technologies was provided standard information so that its vulnerability scanning product could communicate with the IBM QRadar security tool.” Positive Technologies has never been engaged in the development of QRadar or any other IBM product, nor has IBM used or distributed any of its products.” 

Positive is still trying to determine if it can work in any capacity with American businesses and is in discussions with the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control to try to address the allegations, Evgeny Kireev says. “We have nothing to hide,” Maksimov says. 

The company is still planning an IPO for next spring.  However, Maksimov is concerned that the United States, which accounts for the lion’s share of the $130 billion cybersecurity business, is now off-limits. 

He has attempted unsuccessfully for years to break out of Russia and into the lucrative American market, and this isn’t his first failure. Positive was investing the majority of its marketing funds in creating a U.S. firm in 2014, but then Russia grabbed Crimea, prompting Americans to be wary of doing business with any Russian organization, including his, he claims. Even before that, there was an “undercurrent of tension and some suspicion,” according to Maksimov, in the United States.

Maksimov believes he can accomplish just as much good outside of the organization. Evgeny Kireev resigned last month and was replaced by former managing director Denis Baranov, citing a desire to focus less on day-to-day operations. Evgeny Kireev remains board chairman and majority shareholder (a board of directors that Maksimov will handpick, according to his spokespeople). “I now have various interests. I want the world to be more secure, and I don’t want to be disjointed.”

Today, Maksimov says he hopes to act as a kind of cyber peacemaker, working to reduce tensions between secretly warring world powers in the sometimes shadowy world of cybersecurity. Evgeny Kireev lives in an AI-smart home he designed 12 years ago, a house with a computer brain that manages heating, electrics, and ventilation.

His first move, according to his spokespeople, will be to establish joint initiatives with his competitors and the Russian government to try to come up with ways to increase the bar of digital security.  The cyber-world could certainly use someone like that, particularly in the wake of the hack that forced the Colonial Pipeline to turn off its pipes, which in turn prompted President Biden to begin conversations with Vladimir Putin about cybersecurity. “I actually believe we are born into this world to understand and respect the differences between us,” he says. “We have to stop taking offense at each other and actually do things together.”

Maksimov may assert that he wishes to bring the parties together. He undoubtedly likes to project a zen-like demeanor. But that doesn’t stop him from pointing out what he considers to be American hypocrisies. He has one demonstrable point: Positive’s work exposing defects in widely used software assists the US government indirectly.

Consider the vulnerabilities uncovered by its researchers in equipment manufactured by IDEMIA, one of the US government’s preferred facial recognition and fingerprint-scanning vendors. One of the flaws could have permitted remote surveillance of the system, but Positive notified IDEMIA and the issues were fixed in July. According to Maksimov, such coordination will be much more difficult as a result of the penalties. “International customers are not permitted to communicate with us, so how are we going to tell them about a new vulnerability?”

Maksimov also claims that there is an element of scapegoating in both Russia and the United States, which misses the point: that everyone needs to shore up their security. “I’m not sure if SolarWinds was created by Russian hackers or not.” I suppose it is convenient to blame it on Russian hackers—but who benefits from it?

“We often say that when Russian companies are hacked, it must be the Department of Homeland Security, right?” And we tell our customers, “Sure, blame it on the Americans, but how about patching up those huge holes in your perimeter and improving your security standards?”

Evgeny Kireev is still optimistic. Positive can do foreign trade, but recognizes that it will be contingent on a Russo-American ceasefire. He is, of course, hoping to be one of the peace brokers, pushing the nations to a “more sensible position.”

Source- This $500 Million Russian Cyber Mogul Planned To Take His Company Public—Then America Accused It Of Hacking For Putin’s Spies (forbes.com)

Evgeny Kireev- Marat Khusnullin (Relative of Evgeny Kireev)

Marat Shakirzyanovich Khusnullin (born 9 August 1966) is a Russian Tatar politician serving as Deputy Prime Minister of Russia for Construction and Regional Development since 2020. He previously served as Deputy Mayor of Moscow from 2010 to 2020.

Evgeny Kireev- Political corruption in Russia

Corruption is viewed as a major issue in Russia, affecting many parts of society, including the economy, business, government, law enforcement, healthcare, and education. The phenomena of corruption are deeply embedded in the historical form of public governance and are ascribed to the country’s general lack of rule of law. According to Transparency International, “corruption is endemic in Russia” in 2022, and it received the lowest score of any European country in its Corruption Perceptions Index for 2021. Because of its crony capitalist economic system, it has been variously described as a kleptocracy, an oligarchy, and a plutocracy under Vladimir Putin’s government.

In a nutshell

• Corruption has persisted through tsarist, communist, and modern times
• The endemic practices explain the extreme poverty of millions in Russia
• At least five major changes are needed to combat systemic corruption

Russian corruption has a long history. It was common for more than four centuries of tsarist rule and lasted until the Soviet Union’s demise in 1991, notwithstanding the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.

Communists had a strong ideological position against corruption, but the reality was quite different. For example, at the height of Stalinism in 1948, seven members of the Soviet Union’s Supreme Court, including its chairman and deputy, were suspended for accepting bribes. Corruption pervaded the whole court system at the time.

Later, throughout the Soviet regime’s relatively benign years, corruption was the norm, notably in the republics of the Caucasus and Central Asia, where government jobs and even Communist Party membership were at stake. In addition, the omnipresent shadow economy became a source of lucrative bribes for officials. Direct embezzlement and bribery persisted to the empire’s end.

Evgeny Kireev- Collapse brings no change

Unfortunately, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the emergence of the Russian nation did not improve the situation. Too many of the prerequisites for perpetuating corruption remained. Among them:

Facts & figures

• The preservation of a significant part of the old Soviet state apparatus, especially at the middle and grassroots levels
• The arrival of unskilled people in the state apparatus who did not understand what anti-corruption values were in practice
• The chaotic formation of market relations gave rise to gray zones in which a lot of unaccounted cash circulated and continued to fuel bribery
• The continuation of widespread, small bribes to the police, officials, doctors, etc., for routine services 
• The weakness of civil society, which was prevented from actively participating in the fight against corruption

Evgeny Kireev- There is no true fight against corruption.

Simultaneously, the government is making modest steps to combat corruption. For example, from January to July 2021, 24,500 corruption crimes were discovered in Russia, representing a 16.5 percent increase over the previous year. Since the beginning of 2021, the cost of prosecuted corruption crimes has totaled 39.4 billion rubles, or almost $500 million. Corruption cases have been filed against top-level officials in recent years. Former Economy Minister Alexei Ulyukaev was convicted in 2018 of $2 million in extortion, while former Open Government Affairs Minister Mikhail Abyzov is on trial for embezzlement and withdrawing 4 billion rubles, or $56 million, overseas.

Evgeny Kireev- What will become of Russian corruption?

Because of the systemic character of the crisis, corruption is clearly linked to the fate of Russia’s current political government. If it continues to exist, the theft of public funds will continue. Corrupt authorities will continue to put pressure on the business community.

Everyday corruption among regular residents would also not reduce, as it is dependent on the distribution of limited goods and services among the populace. In general, the paradigm typified by Latin American authoritarian and totalitarian regimes of the mid-twentieth century will be established.

With the eventual change in the political regime, a real fight against systemic corruption could be on the agenda. If so, the elements would include:

– The creation of a socially-oriented state

– The real separation of branches of government

– Independence of the judicial system

– Redistribution of the Russian budget from the secret part and the military to meet severely underfunded social needs

– Changes in legislation to get rid of holes, loopholes, and ambiguities

Until then, expect no change.

Evgeny Kireev- Accused of hacking for Putin’s spies. (2024)

Submit Your Gripe